Rasheed Wallace Comeback, Why Not the Sixers?
Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo! Sports reports that Rasheed Wallace is "serious" about a comeback to the NBA.
Wallace, who retired after 15 seasons in 2010, has been working out and probing some close league friends about possible destinations to sign for the rest of the season, sources said.
[snip]
... one league source who has talked with Wallace recently describes him as "serious" about a return to the NBA this season. Nevertheless, no teams contacted by Yahoo! Sports reported that they had any contact with Wallace, or his representative.
Sheed hasn't played since game seven of the 2010 NBA Finals, where he left everything on the floor for the Celtics – who were without starting center Kendrick Perkins – in a loss to the Los Angles Lakers. Conditioning has long been a concern of Rasheed Wallace, so it's understandable for potential suitors to be hesitant of the 37 year old's comeback attempt.
However; if Sheed is indeed "serious" about getting back into playing shape, the Sixers should take a serious look at the veteran big man. It's a low-risk, high-reward move. One, we all know the Sixers could use another big man (See: Mike's post). Two, Sheed has been a fan favorite everywhere he's played and he's a guy the city could get genuinely excited about. Three, his playing time wouldn't come at the expense of any significant prospect's development, and he wouldn't be asked to do much more than play 15-20 minutes off the bench.
The question then becomes, why would Rasheed chose Philadelphia over other, more serious contenders? The opportunity to play significant minutes, the fact that he's from Philadelphia, and Coach Collins seems like a guy veterans love to play for.
All things considered, I think the chances Sheed lands in Philadelphia are slim to none. The team probably isn't a serious enough contender for Sheed to consider, and it seems like a very un-Sixers like move.
We invite you to follow Liberty Ballers on Twitter and like Liberty Ballers on Facebook.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don’t think he fits on the court either. He spent his last season with the Celts walking up the court and standing at the 3-point line. And at this point I’m not sure that he’d buy into our D without other older vets pushing him along.
Okay. Amending my statement.
His skill set is a great fit for the team. The potential problem is his attitude.
would attitude fit with the idea that he was grossly out of shape when he last played in boston?
"If Iguodala were a legitimate "true" 17 PPG scorer, we’d be a better team. When at least 8 of those points come off the fast break, his true offensive production is a reality: 8-11 PPG." - LeQuan Glover
If we sign Rasheed and Trade for Ben we’d really start be looking a lot like the 2004 Pistons and definitely have some supserstars for a title run!
GUYS THE PISTONS ARE A TEMPLATE DON’T YOU GET THAT
by Michael Levin on Jan 13, 2012 11:29 AM PST up reply actions
I adore Rasheed Wallace.
And I know there are plenty reasons not to. I just can’t help myself. Ever since he went nuts in the middle of a locker room interview for the Pistons while watching a Flyers’ playoff game, I’ve had a soft spot for him.
Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!
Hah.
release Tony Fatigue and signed Wallace because most teams probably won’t take the risk. He’ll probably signed with the Wizards or something.
I think everyone should be bilateral coordinated.
Please don’t make derogatory nicknames for players. They’re annoying and generally unoriginal.
by yosoysean on Jan 13, 2012 3:55 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Rasheed! Rasheed! Rasheed!
Are you ‘NOs’ kidding me!!!
PERFECT FIT…
Sixers are too nice=Rasheed!
Sixers are too small=Rasheed!
Sixers need drama=Rasheed!
Sixers need teachers=Rasheed!
Sixers…‘NOs’…NEED RASHEED!

by 













