Final Thoughts on the Sixers Draft
Now that we've all had a couple days to digest the events of Thursday night, I'd like to take one last look at what the Sixers did and didn't do, and try to better explain why I'm less than pleased with it. I feel like I haven't done a terrific job getting my disappointment across and there's too much focus on the actual players the Sixers selected rather than the philosophy of the people in the organization that make the decisions.
The Sixers came into the draft with picks #16 and #50 in their pocket, amid rumors of trading up to #2 with a deal centered around polarizing wing Andre Iguodala. They ended up doing nothing but sitting at both of their spots, despite the expected slides of a few unsuspecting prospects. They got a solid role player in Nikola Vucevic and another big body in Lavoy Allen, a haul that isn't apocalyptic considering the lack of "pinch me" talent in the 2011 NBA Draft. No, we can't possibly know what's going to happen with Vucevic and Allen so of course passing judgment here is not the end-all, but since we are in the business of opinions, we're quite at liberty to give them.
Most importantly though, for the 4th straight year, the Sixers did nothing on draft day but make the one or two picks they were slated to make. No moves, no tweaks, no sign of activity to make me think they did anything during the draft except hope the one guy they wanted didn't fall during their Solitaire tournament in the War Room. This philosophical flaw in the minds of our brain trust is keeping the Sixers from maximizing their potential.
The last time the Sixers made a draft day trade, it was in 2007 when they moved up 1 (one!) pick in exchange for a 2nd rounder and cash. That was to take Jason Smith instead of Daequan Cook. The other deal was for Herbert Hill (who never played a second of NBA basketball), when Kyrylo Fesenko got shipped to Utah and the mythical "future draft considerations" came into existence. The year before, the Sixers traded Thabo Sefolosha for Rodney Carney and got Edin Bavcic and Bobby Jones for a second-round pick and cash.
Clearly, their draft day trade resume is not excellent. But that doesn't mean trading during the draft is a bad thing - it just means the Sixers have been historically bad at it, at least in the last decade. While they've gotten surprisingly good value for their picks in the middle of the first round (Thaddeus Young, Jrue Holiday, you probably can't make a case for Marreese Speights anymore), they haven't been able to add up the assets necessary to sweeten a future deal and still compete.
Simply, if they thought Vucevic was their guy - terrific. Collins wants him enough to overlook his criminally poor athleticism and low ceiling - fine. But the rest of the league simply didn't see it that way. Houston blew some steam about taking him but there was really no chance they'd pass up on the other talent that came their way a few picks earlier. The Knicks and Mike D'Antoni would never go for a guy like Vucevic because he doesn't fit their system at all (instead of a hybrid defender like Chris Singleton, they opted for offensive versatility and athleticism in Iman Shumpert). So I don't think Vucevic would have gone until either the Blazers at 21 or the Celtics at 25. There were a number of teams trying to inch up a bit and picking up a future first or an early second would have been prudent in exchange for dropping a couple spots to where Vucevic still would be available. And even if he wasn't, the return outweighs the difference between him and (in their mind) a lesser prospect like Tobias Harris or Kenneth Faried. Picking up draft picks and assets is what OKC does so well and how the Clippers have laid the foundation for a contender. And the Sixers have not done that at all.
The same thing goes for the 50th pick. Lavoy is not an NBA player. He may play a few games here and there, but he's not going to make a career in the NBA. The second round is a beautiful place where teams can take a flyer on high-upside players and, if they don't work out, just let them walk away without any penalty. Taking the lowest-upside player in the draft is not conducive to a high reward. Josh Selby may not become anything, but he's a top 10 talent that fell for other reasons and would have been worth rolling the dice on. The Sixers, in all of their conservativeness, did not deem that worth the trouble.
I cannot wait until fresh blood gets shot into this dead shell of a system because these guys are really on life support when it comes to the high intensity atmosphere of draft day. Over the last 46 trades that have gone through on Draft Night, the Sixers have been involved in exactly none of them. Whether it's a lack of interest or a stubborn unwillingness to deviate from the preconceived "plan", the Sixers have been suffocatingly and depressingly quiet on the best day of the offseason each year.
I'm going to root for these two guys and whichever undrafted free agents the Sixers invite to camp, because they're on the team and I want everybody to succeed (except Lou). It's not going to become a constant battle of TOLDJA SO!!'s during the season because everybody's just making their best educated guess in this whole thing and it's not a show of worth whether someone's right or wrong. Let's all just try to be civil with each other because in the big picture, this doesn't matter all that much. The 7th man in a rotation isn't worth getting excited about.
Sum up. Sixers draft? Disappointing but not riot-inducing. It's just frustrating to continue to put faith in a franchise that doesn't seem to know how to think creatively and on their feet when draft day comes and other teams draft circles around us.
36 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Agreed.
+1, rec, etc. What’s to say about this team? They think they are close to being real contenders when they should realize they are actually about as close as Minnesota. Maybe I’m being hyperbolic, but I’m not convinced that being the perennial 8th seed is that much better than camping out in the lottery for several years.
I don’t know how Vucevic will turn out, and it is unlikely a #50 pick makes the team. I will root for both guys to exceed expectations and turn doubters into believers like some previous pick have done.
As for “they should have traded back”- I don’t buy that. They were picking #16. It’s not like making a reach with a top 5 selection. If you see a guy who your coach really wants and the guy is projected to go in the 1st round then you take them. It does not matter if 28 other GM’s are not interested- it only takes 1 other GM to grab the player you want if you pass on them. And no one can say they were plugged in well enough to know what all of the other teams would have done after pick #16. This is not the NFL where you have a 53 man roster, many needs and a big selection of available players to fill them. Instead you have 1 1st round pick and you want to get the right guy. There may only be 15 players who become solid pro’s in the entire draft. If you ID a guy at #16 who you feel is your guy you don’t get fancy and try to get an additional #55 pick.
I’m not a huge fan of the pick mostly because it re-inforces a trend away from athletes. Look at their recent acquisitions: Vucevic, Hawes, Turner, Brackins and Nocioni. All of these guys have knocks against them in terms of lacking elite athleticism. But that seems like the direction that Thorn and Collins want to take the team. I guess we will have to see how it pans out. To be fair, the athlete first strategy the Sixers used to have (Sam, Iguodala, Carney, Thad, Smith) had mixed results.
We don’t know how good Vucevic will be. A lot depends on how his game develops and whether he has the bulk and length to get shots off effectively in the lane. If not he will become a perimeter guy like Hawes or Okur- which is less ideal. But people should not assume he will be a bad player just because they would have preferred a different type of player. There are hyper-athletic centers who fail and plodding ones who succeed. We’ll just have top hope Vucevic proves a lot of doubters wrong and that Collins is right that this was the type of player he needed.
I'm not sure...
…that anyone is saying that Vucevic is a terrible player (I don’t think Lavoy makes the roster, so we can bypass that whole discussion). I’m pretty sure he’s going to be an OK role player. I think the problem is exactly what Mike said, the front office mindset is so very passive. I don’t sense an inclination, or even a willingness, to take a chance, think out of the box, embrace risk. They sit back, do the obvious, then move on to their first-round playoff loss.
Admittedly, there is risk involved with aggressive thinking. Look at Minnesota’s draft this year. But we all have been assuming that Thorn is more basketball-savvy than Kahn (I’m pretty sure I am more basketball-savvy than Kahn). On the other hand, at least the guy is trying to move around, do stuff, make something happen for that eternally-crappy franchise he oversees. Just because he’s a moron, he fails. But Thorn is supposed to be a smart guy. And he made his reputation as a trader. Willie Green and Jason Smith for Brackins and the Donger isn’t exactly what I’m looking for (considering how little Craig and Dong played for us, you could make a case that we actually got worse). There’s no sense that Thorn & Co. have any plan to make the team dramatically better, or even significantly better, other than “Hey, I hope we get lucky and this big awkward doof we just drafted turns out to be Wilt Chamberlain.”
Vucevic isn’t the disease. He’s a symptom. And I’m sure he’ll have some good games, where everyone will be like “HEY!!! I TOLD YOU VUCEVIC WAS AWESOME AND WE WILL BNOW WINS CHAMOPIIONSHIP!!!!!!” We had those games from Hawes, too. And he’ll have some games where he gets dominated by Rasho Nesterovic (is Rasho still in the league?). Anyway. He himself seems like an adequate player and a nice kid, and he’ll probably be an acceptable role player, and he was only the #16, and this draft sucked, and I get all that.
He’s not the problem. How he got here is the problem.
I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, there will be no trade for Monta!
Couldn’t agree more. I actually like that we got Vucevic, because I think, at 16, a Hawes with a back to the basket game is a nice addition, and something that we needed. I just can’t believe that we didn’t do something to move up and get MORE. If Vucevic was the “other” guy that we got in the draft, I think we’d all be ok with it, because we did obviously need a center.
by The Crooked Man on Jun 27, 2011 8:07 AM PDT up reply actions
I’m not much of one for being impressed by making moves. Daniel Snider makes a bunch of moves… Since I don’t know what was out there in terms of offers it is hard to bash them. It’s similar to the Iguodala situation. No one wants them to trade him for Hedo, but if that is the only type of player available for Iguodala (due to his contract) then its better to not make a move. A lot of moves are shuffling deck chairs. They can help your team, but they don’t move the needle for me.
As for Vucevic, I think there is an inherent bias because he is white and can’t jump high that he has a very low ceiling. I’m not saying he is going to be Marc Gasol… but he very well could be that good or better. I won’t criticize people for thinking the guy will be a low end role player. IBut I don’t understand the perception that he is pre-determined to be that guy simply becasue Hawes is a bum- becasue Hawes is a bum for reasons that go beyond physical tools.
What I’m trying to say is that a lot of people act as if Vucevic is a 30 year vet who we know exactly what he can and can’t bring. The guy is 21 and had a balanced inside-outside game in college. His 3/4 court sprint is 11th best of the 49 centers drafted in the 1st round on record at draftexpress. So to say that the guy cannot run the floor and cannot score inside at the pro level is an opinion and not a proven fact at this point.
Fair enough. Like I said, my issue isn’t necessarily with Vucevic himself. In fact, I was pushing him hard when he was an early-second prospect, and I thought they should make some effort to move up in the second and grab him. I thought he represented nice value at like 40, which is where he was sitting a few months ago. I don’t believe I ever said Nik is a bum (except maybe on draft night, when I was pissed).
I think the frustration is that we see people that are doing things and making moves and these (with one notable exception, which I already addressed – see “moron” above) seem, for the most part to be the teams that are improving.
I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, there will be no trade for Monta!
Sorry, was not specifically targeting your reaction to the pick. I was not very excited by it either, or my sense of where the team is going.
But honestly, I don’t know if this team has many good options right now. They are stuck in mediocrity and probably need to target 2 years from now as when things might be able to be turned around in a big way.
The Sixers, always 2 years away… from being 2 years away..
I’m not sure if there trending away from athletes. Hawes & Nocioni aren’t here long term & that was the best offer they could get for Sam who didn’t want to be here. Also with Turner, Collins supposedly wanted Favors & I think Thorn favored Favors over Turner so if he was here for the last draft it wouldn’t surprise me if Favors was here instead Turner.
Also I’m not sure why some of you think Allen doesn’t make the roster. We are definately losing 3 or 4 players(Dong, Kapono, Daniels, & maybe Battie) & then we don’t know what will happen with a couple other players. Collins supposedly likes him & he came in for a couple workouts. He probably goes through what Brackins did last year or he is on the bench getting minutes here & there at the end of games
Ed Stefanski
“We talked to so many teams about so many things, moving here and moving there,” Stefanski said. “We were very serious about moving up, but we couldn’t do it because the price was too expensive. It fell our way.”
http://www.libertyballers.com/2011/6/24/2242361/quotable-the-nikola-vucevic-edition-philadelphia-sixers
Who knows who the team was targeting in trying to move up. We all assume the front office was offering Andre Iguodala as the main enticement from the Sixers side of a trade, so you have to wonder which other Sixers player/s other teams wanted that made the price to high.
As for trying to acquire late first round picks or early second round picks, it’s hard to blame the front office if the owner won’t put up the money for these moves. The front office can only do what the owner sanctions, and I’ve read here plenty of times that the Sixers are an afterthought for the owner.
And as for the drafting of Lavoy Allen. It’s quite possible that he was drafted with the intention/knowledge that he won’t make the team. Maybe we tried off loading the number 50 selection, but no team wanted to take it.
As I have already said elsewhere, I am sure that the NBA owners are looking to reduce the number of playing staff they have to pay. I am sure I have read (I just can’t find the source to reference it) that the owners want a 12 man roster in the new CBA. If we resign Hawes and Young, and add Vucevic, then we’re at a 12 man roster.
I agree with the frustration of this team not making moves to move up in past years
but this year, in this weak draft, with the impending lockout, I don’t know if I blame them this year. If they’re stagnant next year, then feel free to rip them a new one.
by phillyhoosfan on Jun 27, 2011 9:16 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I love the root for everyone except Lou comment above!!! Agree.
NBA rated our draft day “HEAD OF THE CLASS”:
Draft picks: C Nikola Vucevic, 16th, first round; F Lavoy Allen, 50th, second round
Our take: The Sixers were looking to improve themselves up front and Vucevic fits the bill. He rocketed up the charts after measuring 6-foot-11 3/4 in shoes and 259 pounds at the Chicago pre-Draft camp and more than holding his own against the other center prospects in Chicago and in subsequent workouts. He should provide some offensive pop for a team that didn’t get much of that from its bigs last season. Allen is a local (Temple) product with an active body who could sneak into some minutes in the rotation next season.
So, as we all agree, time will tell. I personally think ya’ll will be very surprised how well this draft looks down the road. And, personally, I do not want to see Hawes start anymore on this team. He is a fine rotation player but he is not an NBA (or NBA-D) starter, imo.
I’ve warmed to Vucevic and wouldn’t be surprised if he takes Hawes’ job after he finds his way on the NBA level. But I guess its just a reflection of how poor our center position is. Sure, we addressed a weakness in the draft, but we didn’t solve the problem. We stuck a bandaid on a blown water main.
This draft is a destined afterthought, along with an ownership change and being mired in this uncertain atmosphere of the CBA where we might not even have a season next year. I know how uncreative and conservative our front office is, but I truly believe that this time, there are other factors in play that are keeping us grounded. Which, honestly, is a buzzkill, because we want something (good) to happen.
There’s still a chance that Andre gets traded after the CBA/ownership shakes out. I watched those post-draft vids of the FO and Collins and they still say a primary scorer is a need. They say that Jrue or Evan can be that guy, but you know Ellis and others are on their list as well. But overall, I’d say the chances of Andre returning a Sixer are a good one, which may not be a bad thing, provided we can cultivate a primary scorer on our own roster.
That’s a big “if,” however.
Yeah, the front office sort of painted themselves into a corner. Heading into the draft the team had zero PF/C options in place for when Brand is gone. The front-court is the most difficult area for a team to address, and now they are forced tocatch up on the fly becasue Speights and Hawes were duds.
I understand.....
I understand the frustration people are having with their selections. But before we officially judge let’s see what we do with some of these undrafted rookies. I feel like we may have a more light-hearted (Lighty) view of the draft if we selected that #23 guard from Ohio State, Demetri McCameym, or even a Matt Howard from Butler. I understand the disappointment with the picks. I, myself, wasn’t pleased. But let’s see what happens in the next couple weeks before we jump to final conclusions.
What would you have had them do differently? You can’t criticize them without telling us what they should have done, but you got nothing. SO SHUT THE HELL UP!
The idea of trading Iggy for Derrick Williams was always absurd, so I’m not sure how you can criticize them for that. And the idea of trading down from 16 and praying that Vucevic fell is something that no team would do.
To say with absolute certainty that the Knicks would “never” go for a guy like Vucevic is kind of unbelievable to me. Why did they work him out? I think it’s highly possible that they would have picked Vucevic, but regardless, we have no idea. And that’s the point.
They should never make a trade just for the sake of making a trade. If the best move is not moving up (which probably was the case, since they did try to move up and thought the price was to high), then stay put and draft who you want. Vucevic fills a need, and Lavoy Allen will make the team, despite the strange guarantees from this blog that he won’t.
I agree wholeheartedly that the Knicks would have considered Vucevic..just because they worked him out. I wouldn’t have bet on them drafting him, but who knows? Washington could use another 7 footer, as could the Bucks. Houston liked him and was almost guaranteed to take him at 23. Denver could possibly use him. There was basically no chance of him being there at No. 25. Vucevic was one of the high risers in the draft and I understand the Sixers worrying about him not being there had they traded back. There was even rumblings about him being taken before our pick, so they made the safe and correct move considering they wanted him. It’s not like what the Kings did where they traded back three spots for Jimmer. Detroit and Charlotte were not going to take him, and he was a much better value at No. 10 than at No. 7. I’d actually go as far to say that Jimmer at No. 7 would be more of a stretch than Vucevic at No. 16.
Also, I would say New York went with Shumpert because of his defensive ability. They feel he will be better offensively, but defense was the main reason he was selected. Billups isn’t a good defender and neither is Douglas, so they want someone who can lock down in the backcourt. Another factor is that Landry Fields fell off near the end of the season. But yeah, defense and the fact that he plays a position of more need (guard), whereas Singleton plays the same position that Carmelo and Amare play.
We did trade for Brackins post draft last year, so technically we’ve done something with the draft other than just stand pat. Just not on draft day.
It’s not going to become a constant battle of TOLDJA SO!!’s
Everyone will be saying this, either about Vucevic’s success or lack thereof. My personal thoughts are as follows: From watching his draftexpress workout, the guy seemed to have a solid jump shot. He doesn’t have a lot of lift when he shoots (obviously because he can’t jump high) so I’m not sure how well he’s going to be able to create space to get off his shot. I’m also not sure how well he’s going to be able to back down NBA centers. I hear that he can go to both hands in the post. He’ll definitely need to rely on this if he wants to resemble any bit of effectiveness at the NBA level. Either that or just hope he gets guarded by David Lee every night. Where I’m optimistic is in his apparent work ethic. This is something Hawes doesn’t have. Couple this with his impressive wingspan and I think his ceiling should be higher than Hawes’. If that is the case, then this indicates an improvement in the roster. I’m definitely in support of any type of improvement.
All in all, I’m more in favor of not signing Hawes to anything long term and keeping options open to improving the center position in the future.
"I admire his competitiveness. As much as I admire it, I thought that he was trying too hard."- Eddie Jordan
I hope that this front office strategy ends with this ownership. At least that may be sooner rather than later.
"Great, I got that "excited/scared" feeling. Like 98% excited, 2% scared. Or maybe it's more - It could be two - it could be 98% scared, 2% excited but that's what makes it so intense."
-Armageddon
by flyrman57 on Jun 27, 2011 5:40 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Jumping in the conversation a little late but ...
the way I feel about the draft has already been stated by other members of LB. I would have liked to see them possibly go for upside and potential of a player like Singleton but I’m not crying about the selection of Vucevic (only on draft night). After the dust settled and I looked at the situation rationally I don’t think it was a monumental mistake. Hopefully he proves everyone wrong and ends up being a great pick.
formerly jdcvr6
"When I'm dead and buried, and my time here has passed. I want them to bury me upside down, so my critics can kiss my ass." - Bob Knight
I think another thing that makes the Sixers passive strategy so frustrating is watching what Ed Snider’s other team is doing. On the day of the NBA draft the Flyers traded two of their best players because they didnt think the team was good enough. This was from a team that had made the finals the previous year. The Sixers barely make the playoffs but dont seem to have a sense of urgency to try and get better.
hockey and basketball are completely different sports. What you do with one or two players on a basketball team has much more of an impact than with a hockey team. Not to mention, the leagues are structured differently, and this certainly plays a large part.
Being impatient and blowing everything up doesn’t guarantee success. It could send the sixers back much farther. Waiting for the right time, perhaps an appropriate trade or for contracts to expire could work out better. I would hate for the sixers to get rid of valuable players in exchange for garbage.
"I admire his competitiveness. As much as I admire it, I thought that he was trying too hard."- Eddie Jordan
Even if we didn’t trade down for Vuecevic plus extra value I feel we could of traded down for a talent of similar quality plus that extra value if he somehow was off the board. That’s why looking at currnet need the way the Sixers did bothered me…..especially since we aren’t good enough yet to draft for need.
Easily at least half of the teams in the league made the same mistake, though.
On the bright side, if Vucevic can play any defense at all (I mean at all), he’ll probably be an upgrade to Hawes.
Let coach Collins, his assitant coaches, and management make the decisions regarding the future of this franchise. Although we would like to see deals, we like, made to improve this team, we should trust the decisions they are making, to make this team better, because there job security is at stake if they do not succeed.

by 













