A Pessimistic Preview of the Philadelphia 76ers 2011-12 Season
The Philadelphia 76ers are coming off a season in which they went 41-41, made the playoffs, and barely evaded a sweep at the hands of eventual Eastern Conference champion Miami Heat. With a new coach in Doug Collins left to clean up the mess that Eddie Jordan left, expectations were low enough that a 14-win improvement and a first round playoff exit got the organization excited at the young team they're putting out there. Now here we are a few months later, having narrowly avoided a lost season, with almost the exact same team as the quirky hustlers that went .500 in 2010-11 and a new ownership that wants to continue the same trajectory.
Earlier this morning, Jordan ran an article outlining his optimism at the Sixers shortened season ahead of us. In keeping with my Grinch-like qualities, I'll be playing Devil's Advocate, Mr. Scrooge, Salazar Slytherin, Miss Trunchbull, Jaime Lannister, that muscle-y guy from Avatar, ccancer, and the Soup Nazi to his rose-colored glasses he can't seem to take off. Brace yourself for a harsh dose of realism and neverending depression after the jump. Happy Christmas, Harry's and Ron's.
Lack of a SuperstarThe NBA isn't a place where you get enough decent guys together and win a championship. Without a superstar, mediocrity and failure are as imminent as a Louis Williams isolation. It's not because superstars get the fans excited to buy tickets, lacking a true top 10 player in the league that they can count on to carry the team makes them vulnerable to teams that have one. Asserting dominance at crucial points in the game and the season comes from having a guy that teams can't stop. The Sixers do not have that guy.
2004 Detroit Pistons
They're chanting the same words about trying to emulate the 2004 Pistons, a team that won a championship despite not having one of the upper-echelon players in the league. Chauncey Billups and Rasheed Wallace were better in '04 than any of our current players and Ben Wallace was the best defensive player in the league. It's not like they started Jason Smith and Jarron Collins. They started five defensive-minded players with the right coach and the right formula and happened to run into a Lakers team that was busy trying to dole out charity championships to decrepit Karl Malone and brittle Gary Payton. That Pistons team is an anomaly. It has happened exactly once in the modern era and should not be a template for half the teams in the league who decide since they don't have a superstar, we'll just be the Pistons. It doesn't work like that.
A Commitment to What
Doug Collins, since arriving last year, has done and said all the right things to try to get the casual fan back into Sixerland. They want to win now, they're not settling for losses, we're all about improving... anything to attract those straggling Eagles fans who don't like hockey. But while the Sixers will almost surely finish with a slightly better record than last year and make the playoffs, the team hasn't and won't exponentially improve to the point of actually contending with the top-tier teams in the Eastern Conference. If the Sixers are committed to winning games, sure, this is going to be a fine season for winning a few. But if they're committed to winning a championship, this is not the right path.
Youth Improvement
The development of Jrue Holiday and Evan Turner remains the most, and borderline only, important element to the hypothetical future "contender" status of this team. If Jrue and Evan can maximize their potential, then the Sixers could actually be one very talented big man away from being legitimate. Jrue should be taking the ball to the basket and tailoring his game after Deron Williams, while Evan's game could most resemble Paul Pierce. These are their ceilings that can only be reached if the team is placed in their hands.
Thaddeus Young is very interesting and could develop into an actual basketball player someday. But he's got way too many holes in his game to be considered a starting power forward and after four years in the league, it seems unlikely that he'll ever develop a jump shot, improve his defense, or become at least an average defensive rebounder. Jodie Meeks is a bench player. That he is starting is unfortunate. Nikola Vucevic looks like he'll top out as a below-average starting center but could be nice as a first big off the bench. The same can be said for current starter, Spencer Hawes. Craig Brackins and Lavoy Allen figure to be role players now and going forward. Marreese Speights is on his way out.
Andre Iguodala and Elton Brand
The decision being made not to amnesty Brand and trade Iguodala should surprise no one, but it is indicative of the direction the new owners, Rod Thorn, and Doug Collins feel this team is going. Getting the cap flexibility would be huge in going after a top-flight big man in the 2013 offseason, but the front office has convinced itself that this team can win a championship by the time Elton's contract expires. They've also showed their hand on priorities, leaving a supremely talented and under-appreciated but miscast Iguodala in front of the potentially more rounded Turner. The best move for the future of the franchise would be to amnesty Brand, trade Iguodala for expiring contracts and a lottery pick and let Jrue and Evan run the team, hopefully acquiring a young and able big man in the process. But this would upset the trajectory of the post-Iverson era mediocrity and lose all twelve fans the Sixers have gained since their playoff cup of coffee last season.
Outlook
There's no question the Sixers will be hovering just over .500 the next two years. What happens after that depends on how Jrue and Evan have developed and whether a stud big man has fallen into their lap in the middle of the first round. If the Sixers want to win a championship - not just make the playoffs, not win a few games - win a championship, they will need to bring in significant talent that can only be acquired by ridding themselves of who they believe to be integral players to their current "success".
It's undeniably depressing to think like this as an NBA fan because yes, watching your favorite team win is infinitely more fun than watching them lose, but it's significantly more distressing to think that the Sixers' goal is not to win a championship. This isn't Little League, this is a business. And while the 2011-12 Sixers figure to be an exciting, relatively young team to watch, that nagging consciousness in the back of your head will linger for years to come.
48 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Balls on accurate. It’s sad to realize that we’re shooting for mid level mediocrity. I can’t drink that Kool-Aid. It seems like eons ago since I was in the Vet celebrating a Sixers title with Doc, Moses, and Toney…
"Fly Eagles fly..."
"Only the Lord saves more than Bernie..."
by 92-74-99-96 on Dec 25, 2011 2:28 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Merry Christmas to all of you, and your families…
"Fly Eagles fly..."
"Only the Lord saves more than Bernie..."
by 92-74-99-96 on Dec 25, 2011 2:33 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
If Jrue and Evan can maximize their potential, then the Sixers could actually be one very talented big man away from being legitimate.
by Jordan Sams on Dec 25, 2011 12:58 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
+1
The best move for the future of the franchise would be to amnesty Brand, trade Iguodala for expiring contracts and a lottery pick and let Jrue and Evan run the team, hopefully acquiring a young and able big man in the process.
by Jordan Sams on Dec 25, 2011 12:59 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
I think Jrue and Turner can develop into a good enough one-two combo to make us a borderline legitimate team. I agree with trading Iguodala, but I don’t think you can fault the new ownership for not trading him yet. They deserve the opportunity to evaluate him and the rest of the roster for a few months before making any rash decisions.
by Jordan Sams on Dec 25, 2011 1:00 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
I wouldn’t say I’m faulting them. Just that they have shown what their priorities are.
by Michael Levin on Dec 25, 2011 1:36 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions
Michael Levin
Truth Speaker.
formerly jdcvr6
"When I'm dead and buried, and my time here has passed. I want them to bury me upside down, so my critics can kiss my ass." - Bob Knight
im really tired of all the bad mouthing and pessimism. stop writing posts on here. every time i come to this website it’s nothing but trash talking the team i love and can’t wait to see succeed.
seriously, you…Michael Levin need to stop with your damn negativity. It’s not good for the team. I don’t think you realize the damage you’re doing when you constantly post on a sixers fan website nothing but garbage about them. cheer up kiddo. we have a great team, and when they start turning heads i bet you’ll be the first to be posting more bullshit.
I just mostly lurk here, but if I remember correctly, last year he insisted through at least February that the Sixers were garbage and absolutely not making the playoffs. I think the team will prove him wrong again this year.
It’s a good thing there’s an archive.
As early as January Michael wrote an article titled “Pick Your Sixers Playoff Opponent.” Why would he do this if he didn’t think the team would make the playoffs?
Is it wrong to be upset with the Sixers for seemingly embracing mediocrity? There is nearly zero chance that this roster will ever be able to contend for a title as it’s currently constructed. That is all that Michael is saying. If you are content with a 4 seed and maybe a playoff series win then that’s fine. Some of us would rather do whatever is possible to obtain the superstar that is necessary for a championship though.
OK I was one month off, I should have said “through January,” not “through February.” But these are prize quotes:
“This is not a good basketball team.”
“If you have deluded yourself into thinking the Sixers are a good basketball team, congratulations.”
“Keep fooling yourself if you want. I’m not here to tell you what to think. For me, though, every game this Sixers team wins is to the detriment of its future success. And it makes me nauseous.”
‘This is a bad team.’
No, it’s not a bad team. It’s a pretty good team that is improving, it showed that last year after this post was written, and it will show that again this year. No, they aren’t good enough to beat the Heat in a playoff series, but no one is. The Sixers can beat any other team in the east in a series (save maybe the Bulls but it would be close).
http://www.libertyballers.com/2011/1/28/1962333/sixers-collapse-to-grizzlies-bad-teams-do-this
How about this one?
They are not competing for a championship, they will not win more than one game in a playoff series, and they should not be in a playoff series to begin with — in the West, they wouldn’t be smelling the 8th seed.
by Michael Levin on Dec 26, 2011 8:04 AM PST up reply actions
That’s a fair comment, and accurate.
I never said that everything you have posted is wrong. What I said was that your post that “this is a bad team” is wrong. And it’s relevant to your “pessimistic” prognostication of this season and the future.
You said they were a bad team last year, even at the end of January, and you were wrong. So, in response to the guy above (TuskandTemper) who was seriously lamenting your pessimism, I pointed out that you’ve been wrong in the past on your pessimism. In other words, we really shouldn’t sweat your pessimism.
Well you shouldn’t sweat my pessimism at all because I’m a person that doesn’t matter.
But if we’re having a logical discussion, the Sixers finished .500 last season, which I believe is the worst possible result, since they are 1) not good enough to contend for a championship; and 2) not bad enough to get a top pick. I said they were a bad team that was going to make the playoffs in a weak Eastern Conference and lose in the first round. I stand by that. Mediocre, to me, is bad.
by Michael Levin on Dec 26, 2011 5:59 PM PST up reply actions
Thanks for the comment, I appreciate you taking the time. Just a friendly reminder I don’t work for the Sixers so I’m skeptical about “the damage I’m doing” but you are certainly entitled to your opinion ultimately decide what you will and will not read. Don’t hurt your eyes on my account – feel free to click away.
Happy Christmas, you.
by Michael Levin on Dec 25, 2011 11:47 PM PST up reply actions
Mike, I agree with you but right now I plan on enjoying this year and hoping they make the necessary changes this summer. Even from the current perspective they know they must replace Brand?. And it will be his replacement that determines whether Jrue and Turner reach their potential – whatever that may be.
If you take away the 3-13 start to last year...
They would have been 38-28. That equates to 47 wins over an 82 game season. If they get any sort of improvement from the youngins they are a 50 win team. 52 would have got them the 4th seed above Orlando last year. No matter how you slice it, this team is on the way up.
Blazer fan here.
Curious, from an outsiders perspective… what do you think of our Blazers squad and the opening night game?
"No one man can even attempt to defend LaMarcus Aldridge" - PoorDick on Canis Hoopus
by FiveOhThree-RipCity!! on Dec 25, 2011 10:17 PM PST reply actions
So, sweep the leg?
'Things are more like today than they have ever been before." Gerald R. Ford
by nyunole on Dec 25, 2011 11:01 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
STRIKE FIRST STRIKE HARD NO MERCY SIR!!
I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, there will be no trade for Monta!
curious
Is the strike first / no mercy thing, a thing for you sixers fans. Pardon my ignorance
by guybudpal on Dec 26, 2011 8:17 AM PST via Android app up reply actions
Worst kind of negativity
The inaccurate kind. First the sixers are destined to be a .500 team for the next couple years. More like a .600 team. That’s a big difference.
Just as importantly, turning over good players to attempt to lose your way into a superstar didn’t make Denver or Nola champs.
The sixers strategy seems to be to build a great, young defensive core … Then try to add a free agent star in 2013 to get over the hump. By then we will know what the upside is for turner and holiday and I’m optimistic about how that looks. I love watching this team play, and if you can’t enjoy that how much of a basketball fan are you?
by Toney2Turner on Dec 26, 2011 4:43 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Seriously, though...
…they are what they are. They’re a first-round playoff team with some interesting young pieces. They are not a championship contender without at least a solid C (sorry, Nik, it ain’t you, I’m pretty sure) and probably an upgrade from M33ks, who’s a nifty bench guy, but not a starting SG. For this one year, their youth gives them a certain advantage over some more veteran teams (read: Celtics) who have creaky knees, and they might be able to grab a series, but no more than that.
Here’s the other thing. We all know what it means for the Sixers to rebuild. It means an Iguodala trade.
We are all working under the assumption that there is some amazing deal for Iguodala out there that will allow them to rebuild properly. I can good and guarantee ya that if there were, Dre would be gone. I’ve been saying here for years (OK, two, but still years) that they can’t just get rid of him to get rid of him, they have to get an Iguodala trade right or they’re screwed for years.
That being said, I think moves will be made, they will probably just make them next year, when Brand has trade value as a large expiring contract. It’s possible…I don’t think probable, but possible, that you could wait a year, trade both Brand and Iguodala, and at least get something decent back.
Everyone is a trade asset. But I don’t think there’s a rush to take whatever comes along. The first offer is usually the worst offer. I am pretty sure no one believes this team, as currently constituted, is going to win a championship. It’s a process. I know we’ve had processes before, and everyone wants to go to a parade down Broad St, but we have to go through this iteration of the process, and not maximizing the return on your assets is just going to ruin the process. And you know that Josh Harris is thinking the same way.
Personally, I think they should build around the unique talents of Tha BOSS and Speezy. They could call the team “Rappin’ and Nappin’.” I think it’s a winner.
I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, there will be no trade for Monta!
by dweebowitz on Dec 26, 2011 6:57 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
I somewhat disagree about trading Iguodala right now
I think we should wait for the offseason to trade him, unless we are out of contention for the playoffs which I doubt. If this team is contending and we trade him hurting our chances, I think it is going to be hard getting our players to play as hard.
I also don’t blame the ownership for wanting to get the fans to come to the game and make money, after the JUST spent hundreds of millions to by the team several months ago. Whether I think it is what is best for the performance of the team is another issue, but I understand and accept their perspective.
"Great, I got that "excited/scared" feeling. Like 98% excited, 2% scared. Or maybe it's more - It could be two - it could be 98% scared, 2% excited but that's what makes it so intense."
-Armageddon
by flyrman57 on Dec 26, 2011 10:24 AM PST via mobile reply actions
How many teams...
…have tried getting rid of good players to attempt to lose your way into a superstar, and utterly failed?
The fallacy of this concept is (as this off season demonstrated) superstars don’t want to play on a bad team! Let’s say the Sixers follow this strategy: “trade Iguodala for expiring contracts and a lottery pick and let Jrue and Evan run the team, hopefully acquiring a young and able big man in the process.”
Name me 5…better yet, name me 3 “young and able big men” that are willing to play in Philadelphia once Iguodala is gone. So you’re stuck with Jrue, Evan, and a bunch of draft picks. You’re hoping for a miracle lottery pick that is gonna save the Sixers franchise, and it just ain’t gonna happen. You want the Sixers perpetually in the lottery until they can acquire a superstar. Basically, you want the Sixers to become the Clippers.
It occurs to me that Mr. Levin must be a huge fan of playing the lottery. According to your logic, I should use my limited accumulated wealth to buy thousands of Powerball tickets hoping for a miracle instead of enjoying my mediocre everyday life by working hard day-to-day.
There is enough realistic, legitimate negativity to talk about regarding this team (aging coach, aging Brand, front office mismanaging cap space, horrible mascots) that was not at all addressed in this post.
Yet again we get another article urging team ownership to draft kids out of junior high based on potential and nonsensical ideas like making a $9 million qualifying offer on damaged goods big man Greg Oden.
During this holiday season, I give thanks for ridding this team of Ed Snider, and the fact that neither Mr. Snider nor Mr. Levin will ever make any personnel decisions regarding this franchise.
The problem with this logic is that the Sixers wouldn’t be trying to convince a superstar to come or a superstar big man, we would DRAFT them with a lottery pick.
"Great, I got that "excited/scared" feeling. Like 98% excited, 2% scared. Or maybe it's more - It could be two - it could be 98% scared, 2% excited but that's what makes it so intense."
-Armageddon
by flyrman57 on Dec 26, 2011 11:50 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
…have tried getting rid of good players to attempt to lose your way into a superstar, and utterly failed?
Hmm… let’s see.
There were the Magic and Bulls when Duncan was going to be a free agent. Magic ended up getting Dwight Howard in the draft. So there’s one team that succeeded even though they didn’t get their primary target. The Bulls ended up bad then mediocre for years before finally having a bad season in the right year to get Rose.
The Heat were bad enough in the right year with Wade. Then they went all-out and dumped what they could to make room for LeBron and Bosh.
The Knicks and Nets dumped pretty much everything for LeBron. Knicks ended up with Melo, Amare, and every free agent wanting to go there and play with those guys. The Nets ended up with Deron Williams and a chance to get Dwight. It remains to be seen if the Nets can be any good but at least they have hope of becoming a contender.
Seattle dumped Ray Allen and Rashard Lewis and ended up with Kevin Durant.
Of course it didn’t work for every team. Minnesota dumped Garnett and still suck. I can’t think of any other case of when a team traded away their best players so they could rebuild and didn’t end up successful though. Not counting the teams that were forced to trade away a star because they wouldn’t stay with the team of course. That’s a completely different situation than willingly dumping players for a rebuild.
The point is that nearly every team that’s contending now had to be bad before being good enough to contend. The only examples are Dallas, who took advantage of early Euro scouting and landed Dirk, and the Lakers who were lucky enough to be one of the only places Kobe was willing to play after the draft and had the ability to trade for him.
There are zero examples of a team toiling in the 40-50 win category and suddenly becoming a contender.
by yosoysean on Dec 26, 2011 2:24 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
I like it so much better when Sean makes my arguments for me.
by Michael Levin on Dec 26, 2011 6:10 PM PST up reply actions
Seriously? Shooting like Iguodala from the field, 1-
Examples of teams who you think the Sixers should emulate: Magic, Bulls, OKC/Thunder, Heat, Knicks, Nets.
Number of championships in last 10 years: 1
Examples of teams who did NOT follow the tank-in-the-right-season process: Dallas, Lakers.
Number of championships in last 10 years: 6
That includes the 2001 Lakers who beat our own 76ers who tanked-in-the-right-year to obtain Iverson. While that was a fun era, how did that ultimately work out?
Thanks for making my points for me.
by PhillyWarrior on Dec 26, 2011 10:23 PM PST up reply actions
I’m just not sure what you’d like them to do. Continue to have no flexibility and ride out whatever middling talent we have on this team?
And yes, after reading your first post fully, I would love for the Sixers to become the Clippers.
by Michael Levin on Dec 26, 2011 10:53 PM PST up reply actions
I’d like to see the following for the 2011-12 season:
- Play Turner 25-30 minutes a game and continue to develop his blossoming game.
- Finish with a record of 38-40 wins to obtain a 4 or 5 seed. Win one round.
- Continue developing Jrue, and give him the green light to work on his offense.
- Play Hawes big minutes so he becomes a viable trade commodity. Trade Hawes at the deadline for a younger, more athletic big man.
I’d like to see the following for the 2012-2013 season/offseason:
- Use the amnesty clause on Brand.
- Begin shopping Iguodala for a younger comparable SF with a more reasonable contract.
- Let Battie, Meeks and Noccioni walk. Do not re-up Lou. If Hawes can’t be traded in 2011, let him walk in 2012.
In a nutshell, I see every single player on this team except for Jrue and Turner as assets that, if properly developed, could be traded/combined for more valuable assets from other teams that know how to properly select in the draft. The biggest difference in our thinking is that I do not believe a #1 draft pick is required to win a championship. I look at guys like Pierce and Nowitski drafted 9th and 10th overall and want those kinds of guys, which are absolutely obtainable with a “middling” record.
Michael, no quality player is going to want to play for the 76ers if they have 10 consecutive years of 15-25 wins. That includes #1 draft picks, who in the current NBA environment would love to simply go to New York, LA or Miami and join whatever superteam is currently being developed.
by PhillyWarrior on Dec 27, 2011 10:23 AM PST up reply actions
This is all reasonable and I commend you for laying it all out. I simply disagree. There’s a philosophical difference between the way we would assemble a basketball team. That’s fine.
A few issues. There’s no chance the Sixers amnesty Brand if they finish with 38-40 wins. They’ll see him as “too valuable” and keep him. Same goes for Iguodala – they won’t move him and risk breaking up the core that is getting oh so much better. You believe that success breeds more success, which in most parts of the universe is true. But in the NBA, with this roster, success breeds mediocrity, cap inflexibility, and stagnation.
by Michael Levin on Dec 27, 2011 12:38 PM PST up reply actions
Now you’re being nuts. No matter how well Iguodala and Brand play this team will not do more than win a 1st round series. This won’t encourage the team to keep them, it will make them appear more attractive to other teams and give the Sixers a chance to clear cap space and bring in players and picks. The Sixers had a top pick last season and passed on Derrick Favors. Sucking to get a good draft pick only works if there’s a franchise player there. I don’t think there was. Wall and Turner and Favors are all NBA players, but none of them appear worthy of being top NBA picks as compared with other drafts. There’s a lot of luck to this.
The more the Sixers win, the more they will keep from trading their players to get younger. I’m extremely confident in this. Remember last year when they started winning some games and said “Iguodala and Brand are off the table”. That’s why.
No one said there wasn’t luck involved but getting a higher draft pick obviously lends itself to being able to draft a better player. There is actually no argument to that point.
by Michael Levin on Dec 28, 2011 1:16 PM PST up reply actions
With the first pick in the NBA draft, the Los Angeles Lakers select ....
Kareem was the number 1 overall pick. He brought a title to the Bucks, then forced his way to LA.
Magic was the number 1 overall pick. The Lakers owned that pick thanks to one of those wacky ’70s NBA trades.
Worthy – No. 1 overall. Lakers were given the pick by Ted Stepian, the worst owner in the history of professional sports.
Shaq – No. 1 overall. Lead Orlando to the finals, then forced his way to LA.
To recap…the Lakers dynasties were paved with no. 1 overall picks.
'Things are more like today than they have ever been before." Gerald R. Ford
streamings
I’m so excited to watch Lakers today, they must win, gonna watch the game on this new streaming site www.mynbatv.com :D eheheh

by 













