Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Now They've Screwed Spurs, UEFA Willing To Review Rule

A Pessimistic Preview of the Philadelphia 76ers 2011-12 Season

The Philadelphia 76ers are coming off a season in which they went 41-41, made the playoffs, and barely evaded a sweep at the hands of eventual Eastern Conference champion Miami Heat. With a new coach in Doug Collins left to clean up the mess that Eddie Jordan left, expectations were low enough that a 14-win improvement and a first round playoff exit got the organization excited at the young team they're putting out there. Now here we are a few months later, having narrowly avoided a lost season, with almost the exact same team as the quirky hustlers that went .500 in 2010-11 and a new ownership that wants to continue the same trajectory.

Earlier this morning, Jordan ran an article outlining his optimism at the Sixers shortened season ahead of us. In keeping with my Grinch-like qualities, I'll be playing Devil's Advocate, Mr. Scrooge, Salazar Slytherin, Miss Trunchbull, Jaime Lannister, that muscle-y guy from Avatar, ccancer, and the Soup Nazi to his rose-colored glasses he can't seem to take off. Brace yourself for a harsh dose of realism and neverending depression after the jump. Happy Christmas, Harry's and Ron's.

Star-divide

Lack of a Superstar

The NBA isn't a place where you get enough decent guys together and win a championship. Without a superstar, mediocrity and failure are as imminent as a Louis Williams isolation. It's not because superstars get the fans excited to buy tickets, lacking a true top 10 player in the league that they can count on to carry the team makes them vulnerable to teams that have one. Asserting dominance at crucial points in the game and the season comes from having a guy that teams can't stop. The Sixers do not have that guy.

2004 Detroit Pistons

They're chanting the same words about trying to emulate the 2004 Pistons, a team that won a championship despite not having one of the upper-echelon players in the league. Chauncey Billups and Rasheed Wallace were better in '04 than any of our current players and Ben Wallace was the best defensive player in the league. It's not like they started Jason Smith and Jarron Collins. They started five defensive-minded players with the right coach and the right formula and happened to run into a Lakers team that was busy trying to dole out charity championships to decrepit Karl Malone and brittle Gary Payton. That Pistons team is an anomaly. It has happened exactly once in the modern era and should not be a template for half the teams in the league who decide since they don't have a superstar, we'll just be the Pistons. It doesn't work like that.

A Commitment to What

Doug Collins, since arriving last year, has done and said all the right things to try to get the casual fan back into Sixerland. They want to win now, they're not settling for losses, we're all about improving... anything to attract those straggling Eagles fans who don't like hockey. But while the Sixers will almost surely finish with a slightly better record than last year and make the playoffs, the team hasn't and won't exponentially improve to the point of actually contending with the top-tier teams in the Eastern Conference. If the Sixers are committed to winning games, sure, this is going to be a fine season for winning a few. But if they're committed to winning a championship, this is not the right path.

Youth Improvement

The development of Jrue Holiday and Evan Turner remains the most, and borderline only, important element to the hypothetical future "contender" status of this team. If Jrue and Evan can maximize their potential, then the Sixers could actually be one very talented big man away from being legitimate. Jrue should be taking the ball to the basket and tailoring his game after Deron Williams, while Evan's game could most resemble Paul Pierce. These are their ceilings that can only be reached if the team is placed in their hands.

Thaddeus Young is very interesting and could develop into an actual basketball player someday. But he's got way too many holes in his game to be considered a starting power forward and after four years in the league, it seems unlikely that he'll ever develop a jump shot, improve his defense, or become at least an average defensive rebounder. Jodie Meeks is a bench player. That he is starting is unfortunate. Nikola Vucevic looks like he'll top out as a below-average starting center but could be nice as a first big off the bench. The same can be said for current starter, Spencer Hawes. Craig Brackins and Lavoy Allen figure to be role players now and going forward. Marreese Speights is on his way out.

Andre Iguodala and Elton Brand

The decision being made not to amnesty Brand and trade Iguodala should surprise no one, but it is indicative of the direction the new owners, Rod Thorn, and Doug Collins feel this team is going. Getting the cap flexibility would be huge in going after a top-flight big man in the 2013 offseason, but the front office has convinced itself that this team can win a championship by the time Elton's contract expires. They've also showed their hand on priorities, leaving a supremely talented and under-appreciated but miscast Iguodala in front of the potentially more rounded Turner. The best move for the future of the franchise would be to amnesty Brand, trade Iguodala for expiring contracts and a lottery pick and let Jrue and Evan run the team, hopefully acquiring a young and able big man in the process. But this would upset the trajectory of the post-Iverson era mediocrity and lose all twelve fans the Sixers have gained since their playoff cup of coffee last season.

Outlook

There's no question the Sixers will be hovering just over .500 the next two years. What happens after that depends on how Jrue and Evan have developed and whether a stud big man has fallen into their lap in the middle of the first round. If the Sixers want to win a championship - not just make the playoffs, not win a few games - win a championship, they will need to bring in significant talent that can only be acquired by ridding themselves of who they believe to be integral players to their current "success".

It's undeniably depressing to think like this as an NBA fan because yes, watching your favorite team win is infinitely more fun than watching them lose, but it's significantly more distressing to think that the Sixers' goal is not to win a championship. This isn't Little League, this is a business. And while the 2011-12 Sixers figure to be an exciting, relatively young team to watch, that nagging consciousness in the back of your head will linger for years to come.

Comment 48 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

For AK-47, "A Very Busy Summer"

May 2012 from NetsDaily - 28 comments

King Optimistic About Three FA's

May 2012 from NetsDaily - 120 comments

Random Ramsdom 5/21/12

May 2012 from Turf Show Times - 2 comments

Comments

Display:

This is more like it.

by yosoysean on Dec 25, 2011 12:17 PM PST reply actions  

Balls on accurate. It’s sad to realize that we’re shooting for mid level mediocrity. I can’t drink that Kool-Aid. It seems like eons ago since I was in the Vet celebrating a Sixers title with Doc, Moses, and Toney…

"Fly Eagles fly..."
"Only the Lord saves more than Bernie..."

by 92-74-99-96 on Dec 25, 2011 2:28 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Merry Christmas to all of you, and your families…

"Fly Eagles fly..."
"Only the Lord saves more than Bernie..."

by 92-74-99-96 on Dec 25, 2011 2:33 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

If Jrue and Evan can maximize their potential, then the Sixers could actually be one very talented big man away from being legitimate.

by Jordan Sams on Dec 25, 2011 12:58 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

+1
The best move for the future of the franchise would be to amnesty Brand, trade Iguodala for expiring contracts and a lottery pick and let Jrue and Evan run the team, hopefully acquiring a young and able big man in the process.

by Jordan Sams on Dec 25, 2011 12:59 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

I think Jrue and Turner can develop into a good enough one-two combo to make us a borderline legitimate team. I agree with trading Iguodala, but I don’t think you can fault the new ownership for not trading him yet. They deserve the opportunity to evaluate him and the rest of the roster for a few months before making any rash decisions.

by Jordan Sams on Dec 25, 2011 1:00 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

I wouldn’t say I’m faulting them. Just that they have shown what their priorities are.

by Michael Levin on Dec 25, 2011 1:36 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

If they can be smart about getting rid of Iguodala and Brand and get a little luck along the way the Sixers can be really solid in 2-3 years. Just have to wait and see..

by jrb5094 on Dec 25, 2011 3:40 PM PST reply actions  

Michael Levin

Truth Speaker.

formerly jdcvr6

"When I'm dead and buried, and my time here has passed. I want them to bury me upside down, so my critics can kiss my ass." - Bob Knight

by James_C on Dec 25, 2011 6:03 PM PST reply actions  

im really tired of all the bad mouthing and pessimism. stop writing posts on here. every time i come to this website it’s nothing but trash talking the team i love and can’t wait to see succeed.

seriously, you…Michael Levin need to stop with your damn negativity. It’s not good for the team. I don’t think you realize the damage you’re doing when you constantly post on a sixers fan website nothing but garbage about them. cheer up kiddo. we have a great team, and when they start turning heads i bet you’ll be the first to be posting more bullshit.

by TuskandTemper on Dec 25, 2011 7:14 PM PST reply actions  

I just mostly lurk here, but if I remember correctly, last year he insisted through at least February that the Sixers were garbage and absolutely not making the playoffs. I think the team will prove him wrong again this year.

by splinter27 on Dec 25, 2011 9:19 PM PST up reply actions  

It’s a good thing there’s an archive.

As early as January Michael wrote an article titled “Pick Your Sixers Playoff Opponent.” Why would he do this if he didn’t think the team would make the playoffs?

Is it wrong to be upset with the Sixers for seemingly embracing mediocrity? There is nearly zero chance that this roster will ever be able to contend for a title as it’s currently constructed. That is all that Michael is saying. If you are content with a 4 seed and maybe a playoff series win then that’s fine. Some of us would rather do whatever is possible to obtain the superstar that is necessary for a championship though.

by yosoysean on Dec 25, 2011 11:03 PM PST up reply actions  

OK I was one month off, I should have said “through January,” not “through February.” But these are prize quotes:

“This is not a good basketball team.”
“If you have deluded yourself into thinking the Sixers are a good basketball team, congratulations.”
“Keep fooling yourself if you want. I’m not here to tell you what to think. For me, though, every game this Sixers team wins is to the detriment of its future success. And it makes me nauseous.”
‘This is a bad team.’

No, it’s not a bad team. It’s a pretty good team that is improving, it showed that last year after this post was written, and it will show that again this year. No, they aren’t good enough to beat the Heat in a playoff series, but no one is. The Sixers can beat any other team in the east in a series (save maybe the Bulls but it would be close).

http://www.libertyballers.com/2011/1/28/1962333/sixers-collapse-to-grizzlies-bad-teams-do-this

by splinter27 on Dec 26, 2011 7:51 AM PST up reply actions  

How about this one?

They are not competing for a championship, they will not win more than one game in a playoff series, and they should not be in a playoff series to begin with — in the West, they wouldn’t be smelling the 8th seed.

by Michael Levin on Dec 26, 2011 8:04 AM PST up reply actions  

That’s a fair comment, and accurate.

I never said that everything you have posted is wrong. What I said was that your post that “this is a bad team” is wrong. And it’s relevant to your “pessimistic” prognostication of this season and the future.

You said they were a bad team last year, even at the end of January, and you were wrong. So, in response to the guy above (TuskandTemper) who was seriously lamenting your pessimism, I pointed out that you’ve been wrong in the past on your pessimism. In other words, we really shouldn’t sweat your pessimism.

by splinter27 on Dec 26, 2011 10:31 AM PST up reply actions  

Well you shouldn’t sweat my pessimism at all because I’m a person that doesn’t matter.

But if we’re having a logical discussion, the Sixers finished .500 last season, which I believe is the worst possible result, since they are 1) not good enough to contend for a championship; and 2) not bad enough to get a top pick. I said they were a bad team that was going to make the playoffs in a weak Eastern Conference and lose in the first round. I stand by that. Mediocre, to me, is bad.

by Michael Levin on Dec 26, 2011 5:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Is there anything he said in this post untrue? Did you just read the headline and decide to bash the writer for it?

by yosoysean on Dec 25, 2011 10:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks for the comment, I appreciate you taking the time. Just a friendly reminder I don’t work for the Sixers so I’m skeptical about “the damage I’m doing” but you are certainly entitled to your opinion ultimately decide what you will and will not read. Don’t hurt your eyes on my account – feel free to click away.

Happy Christmas, you.

by Michael Levin on Dec 25, 2011 11:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Mike, I agree with you but right now I plan on enjoying this year and hoping they make the necessary changes this summer. Even from the current perspective they know they must replace Brand?. And it will be his replacement that determines whether Jrue and Turner reach their potential – whatever that may be.

by tk76 on Dec 25, 2011 8:42 PM PST reply actions  

If you take away the 3-13 start to last year...

They would have been 38-28. That equates to 47 wins over an 82 game season. If they get any sort of improvement from the youngins they are a 50 win team. 52 would have got them the 4th seed above Orlando last year. No matter how you slice it, this team is on the way up.

by BrandonB on Dec 25, 2011 9:50 PM PST reply actions  

Blazer fan here.

Curious, from an outsiders perspective… what do you think of our Blazers squad and the opening night game?

"No one man can even attempt to defend LaMarcus Aldridge" - PoorDick on Canis Hoopus

by FiveOhThree-RipCity!! on Dec 25, 2011 10:17 PM PST reply actions  

The Blazers have weak knees. GO FOR THE KNEES.

by yosoysean on Dec 25, 2011 10:52 PM PST up reply actions  

So, sweep the leg?

'Things are more like today than they have ever been before." Gerald R. Ford

by nyunole on Dec 25, 2011 11:01 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

STRIKE FIRST STRIKE HARD NO MERCY SIR!!

I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, there will be no trade for Monta!

by dweebowitz on Dec 26, 2011 6:39 AM PST up reply actions  

curious

Is the strike first / no mercy thing, a thing for you sixers fans. Pardon my ignorance

by guybudpal on Dec 26, 2011 8:17 AM PST via Android app up reply actions  

Nah. Just a Karate Kid reference , because someone said to go for the knees.

I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, there will be no trade for Monta!

by dweebowitz on Dec 26, 2011 11:52 AM PST up reply actions  

Worst kind of negativity

The inaccurate kind. First the sixers are destined to be a .500 team for the next couple years. More like a .600 team. That’s a big difference.

Just as importantly, turning over good players to attempt to lose your way into a superstar didn’t make Denver or Nola champs.

The sixers strategy seems to be to build a great, young defensive core … Then try to add a free agent star in 2013 to get over the hump. By then we will know what the upside is for turner and holiday and I’m optimistic about how that looks. I love watching this team play, and if you can’t enjoy that how much of a basketball fan are you?

by Toney2Turner on Dec 26, 2011 4:43 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Rec’d for the team nickname.

'Things are more like today than they have ever been before." Gerald R. Ford

by nyunole on Dec 27, 2011 1:00 AM PST up reply actions  

I somewhat disagree about trading Iguodala right now

I think we should wait for the offseason to trade him, unless we are out of contention for the playoffs which I doubt. If this team is contending and we trade him hurting our chances, I think it is going to be hard getting our players to play as hard.

I also don’t blame the ownership for wanting to get the fans to come to the game and make money, after the JUST spent hundreds of millions to by the team several months ago. Whether I think it is what is best for the performance of the team is another issue, but I understand and accept their perspective.

"Great, I got that "excited/scared" feeling. Like 98% excited, 2% scared. Or maybe it's more - It could be two - it could be 98% scared, 2% excited but that's what makes it so intense."

-Armageddon

by flyrman57 on Dec 26, 2011 10:24 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

How many teams...

…have tried getting rid of good players to attempt to lose your way into a superstar, and utterly failed?

The fallacy of this concept is (as this off season demonstrated) superstars don’t want to play on a bad team! Let’s say the Sixers follow this strategy: “trade Iguodala for expiring contracts and a lottery pick and let Jrue and Evan run the team, hopefully acquiring a young and able big man in the process.”

Name me 5…better yet, name me 3 “young and able big men” that are willing to play in Philadelphia once Iguodala is gone. So you’re stuck with Jrue, Evan, and a bunch of draft picks. You’re hoping for a miracle lottery pick that is gonna save the Sixers franchise, and it just ain’t gonna happen. You want the Sixers perpetually in the lottery until they can acquire a superstar. Basically, you want the Sixers to become the Clippers.

It occurs to me that Mr. Levin must be a huge fan of playing the lottery. According to your logic, I should use my limited accumulated wealth to buy thousands of Powerball tickets hoping for a miracle instead of enjoying my mediocre everyday life by working hard day-to-day.

There is enough realistic, legitimate negativity to talk about regarding this team (aging coach, aging Brand, front office mismanaging cap space, horrible mascots) that was not at all addressed in this post.

Yet again we get another article urging team ownership to draft kids out of junior high based on potential and nonsensical ideas like making a $9 million qualifying offer on damaged goods big man Greg Oden.

During this holiday season, I give thanks for ridding this team of Ed Snider, and the fact that neither Mr. Snider nor Mr. Levin will ever make any personnel decisions regarding this franchise.

by PhillyWarrior on Dec 26, 2011 11:10 AM PST reply actions  

The problem with this logic is that the Sixers wouldn’t be trying to convince a superstar to come or a superstar big man, we would DRAFT them with a lottery pick.

"Great, I got that "excited/scared" feeling. Like 98% excited, 2% scared. Or maybe it's more - It could be two - it could be 98% scared, 2% excited but that's what makes it so intense."

-Armageddon

by flyrman57 on Dec 26, 2011 11:50 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

exactly

"Great, I got that "excited/scared" feeling. Like 98% excited, 2% scared. Or maybe it's more - It could be two - it could be 98% scared, 2% excited but that's what makes it so intense."

-Armageddon

by flyrman57 on Dec 26, 2011 4:20 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I like it so much better when Sean makes my arguments for me.

by Michael Levin on Dec 26, 2011 6:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Seriously? Shooting like Iguodala from the field, 1-

Examples of teams who you think the Sixers should emulate: Magic, Bulls, OKC/Thunder, Heat, Knicks, Nets.

Number of championships in last 10 years: 1

Examples of teams who did NOT follow the tank-in-the-right-season process: Dallas, Lakers.

Number of championships in last 10 years: 6

That includes the 2001 Lakers who beat our own 76ers who tanked-in-the-right-year to obtain Iverson. While that was a fun era, how did that ultimately work out?

Thanks for making my points for me.

by PhillyWarrior on Dec 26, 2011 10:23 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m just not sure what you’d like them to do. Continue to have no flexibility and ride out whatever middling talent we have on this team?

And yes, after reading your first post fully, I would love for the Sixers to become the Clippers.

by Michael Levin on Dec 26, 2011 10:53 PM PST up reply actions  

I’d like to see the following for the 2011-12 season:

- Play Turner 25-30 minutes a game and continue to develop his blossoming game.
- Finish with a record of 38-40 wins to obtain a 4 or 5 seed. Win one round.
- Continue developing Jrue, and give him the green light to work on his offense.
- Play Hawes big minutes so he becomes a viable trade commodity. Trade Hawes at the deadline for a younger, more athletic big man.

I’d like to see the following for the 2012-2013 season/offseason:

- Use the amnesty clause on Brand.
- Begin shopping Iguodala for a younger comparable SF with a more reasonable contract.
- Let Battie, Meeks and Noccioni walk. Do not re-up Lou. If Hawes can’t be traded in 2011, let him walk in 2012.

In a nutshell, I see every single player on this team except for Jrue and Turner as assets that, if properly developed, could be traded/combined for more valuable assets from other teams that know how to properly select in the draft. The biggest difference in our thinking is that I do not believe a #1 draft pick is required to win a championship. I look at guys like Pierce and Nowitski drafted 9th and 10th overall and want those kinds of guys, which are absolutely obtainable with a “middling” record.

Michael, no quality player is going to want to play for the 76ers if they have 10 consecutive years of 15-25 wins. That includes #1 draft picks, who in the current NBA environment would love to simply go to New York, LA or Miami and join whatever superteam is currently being developed.

by PhillyWarrior on Dec 27, 2011 10:23 AM PST up reply actions  

This is all reasonable and I commend you for laying it all out. I simply disagree. There’s a philosophical difference between the way we would assemble a basketball team. That’s fine.

A few issues. There’s no chance the Sixers amnesty Brand if they finish with 38-40 wins. They’ll see him as “too valuable” and keep him. Same goes for Iguodala – they won’t move him and risk breaking up the core that is getting oh so much better. You believe that success breeds more success, which in most parts of the universe is true. But in the NBA, with this roster, success breeds mediocrity, cap inflexibility, and stagnation.

by Michael Levin on Dec 27, 2011 12:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Now you’re being nuts. No matter how well Iguodala and Brand play this team will not do more than win a 1st round series. This won’t encourage the team to keep them, it will make them appear more attractive to other teams and give the Sixers a chance to clear cap space and bring in players and picks. The Sixers had a top pick last season and passed on Derrick Favors. Sucking to get a good draft pick only works if there’s a franchise player there. I don’t think there was. Wall and Turner and Favors are all NBA players, but none of them appear worthy of being top NBA picks as compared with other drafts. There’s a lot of luck to this.

by RickoT on Dec 28, 2011 10:45 AM PST up reply actions  

The more the Sixers win, the more they will keep from trading their players to get younger. I’m extremely confident in this. Remember last year when they started winning some games and said “Iguodala and Brand are off the table”. That’s why.

No one said there wasn’t luck involved but getting a higher draft pick obviously lends itself to being able to draft a better player. There is actually no argument to that point.

by Michael Levin on Dec 28, 2011 1:16 PM PST up reply actions  

With the first pick in the NBA draft, the Los Angeles Lakers select ....

Kareem was the number 1 overall pick. He brought a title to the Bucks, then forced his way to LA.

Magic was the number 1 overall pick. The Lakers owned that pick thanks to one of those wacky ’70s NBA trades.

Worthy – No. 1 overall. Lakers were given the pick by Ted Stepian, the worst owner in the history of professional sports.

Shaq – No. 1 overall. Lead Orlando to the finals, then forced his way to LA.

To recap…the Lakers dynasties were paved with no. 1 overall picks.

'Things are more like today than they have ever been before." Gerald R. Ford

by nyunole on Dec 27, 2011 1:26 AM PST up reply actions  

streamings

I’m so excited to watch Lakers today, they must win, gonna watch the game on this new streaming site www.mynbatv.com :D eheheh

by ipassos on Dec 28, 2011 4:07 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools


Editor

Morris_small Jordan Sams

Sharone_wright_sixers_small Michael Levin

Associate Editor

Lourdre2_small Tanner Steidel

Twitter_small Derek Bodner

Contributor

Autographed-photo-ben-rivera-phillies1_05ba981348520854b79233eacee8eeee_small Dave Rueter