Into the Future: Sixers or Blazers
We continue out Into the Future series by comparing the Blazers future to the Sixers. The last installment of the ItF series saw a desperate blogger (me) and Sixers fans alike choose the Sixers future over the Oklahoma City Thunder's, with a twist. The hypothetical twist was: Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook are no longer on the Thunder roster, and Elton Brand is taken off the Sixers roster and placed on the Thunder. My reason for concocting this hypothetical twist was to even out the presumably massive voting discrepancy, and apparently I leveled the playing field too much. Even without KD and Westbrook the Thunder should still hold an advantage over the Sixers in terms of brighter futures simply because of their top-notch front office compared to the Sixers incompetent regime.
So I've learned from my mistake, and today when we compare the Sixers and Blazers' futures no magical, mystical, hypothetical twists will be in play. Straight up, who has the brighter future? This should be an easy one. Breif breakdown after the jump.
(Based on the extremely biased votes of Sixers fans)
Better future than Sixers
-----
Worse future than Sixers
T'Wolves (39%)
Thunder* (47%)
Front Office
Like most front office comparisons the Blazers hold the advantage as long as Stefanski is employed by the Sixers. The hiring of Rod Thorn as president throws a wrench into Sixers front office discussions, but until further notice I'm still chalking them up as plan-less and incompetent.
The Blazers front office looks a little less bullet-proof after the weird events surrounding Kevin Pritchard's draft-night departure, but they replaced him with well-respected Rich Cho, formerly employed by arguably the best front office in basketball, the OKC Thunder.
Valuable Assets
Brandon Roy - Flat-out stud and franchise player.
LaMarcus Aldridge - Decent second/third banana, but probably slightly overpaid.
Joel Pryzbilla expiring contract - Decent trade chip at the deadline assuming Oden and Camby stay healthy.
Greg Oden - If -- and it's a massive 'if' -- if Greg Oden can stay healthy he'd be a huge asset for the Blazers. Paint protector, stud rebounder, great compliment to Aldridge and Roy, and he's still only 22.
Rudy Fernandez - Decent trade chip and/or solid role player.
Nic Batum - Very solid role player. Defends, rebounds, scores efficiently, knows his role, only 22.
Luke Babbitt and Elliot Williams - Rookies on cheap contracts with role player potential.
My take:
This isn't even close. They Blazers have more talent and a much better front office, and everyone in their organization -- from their GM to their roster -- is fairly young and has potential to grow and develop. Color me jealous.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Poll
No option this time? I think Portland would win in a landslide (although I did think the same thing about the Thunder, despite the caveats).
I have to disagree with the above commentor, I would rather have Roy than Iguodala every time.
*Insert obligatory, ‘is Greg Oden really 22 or is that how old his kids are?’ joke here.
I argued Iguodala over Melo, but I’d give Roy the slight edge over both.
by Jordan Sams on Aug 24, 2010 10:54 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Oden's the best player on the team
If he ever gains the ability to stay healthy. Roy is a very good, but slightly overrated, player, not quite what I’d call a stud.
this isn’t even close.
Derek Bodner
LibertyBallers || @derekbodner || derek.bodner@draftexpress.com
BTW gotta disagree on Roy. Curious as to why you think he’s overrated.
by Jordan Sams on Aug 24, 2010 1:40 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I just think he’s a below average defender, and I think it’s fairly hard to build around a below average defender playing that many minutes, even if they’re out of this world offensively. I think he’s very good, slightly better than Iguodala, but not a superstar stud.
Derek Bodner
LibertyBallers || @derekbodner || derek.bodner@draftexpress.com
by Derek Bodner on Aug 24, 2010 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions
That’s where we differ. I think he’s an average defender. My only concern is his health.
Who would be an average defender in your mind, thus a better defender than Roy?
Durant, LeBron, Wade (only in terms of defense). Caron Butler (who I think is overrated defensively). Richard Jefferson. Those are my average wing defenders.
I have Brandon Roy in the Joe Johnson/Rudy Gay class of defenders.
Derek Bodner
LibertyBallers || @derekbodner || derek.bodner@draftexpress.com
by Derek Bodner on Aug 24, 2010 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions
I was much more excited 3 years ago
But I still easily take the Blazers. IF – yes, that’s a big one- Oden can stay on the court for the next few seasons the Blazers will be in the title race, the Lakers and Thunder will be enormous rivals and I really hope the Heat never win a title.
It turns out I overestimated my apathy, but not enough to matter.
Shocking
I’m kinda surprised at how much of a blowout this vote is. Looking at each team’s roster, they can both make a very solid lineup of young players (under 27)?
Blazers:
PG Bayless
SG Roy
SF Batum
PF Aldrigde
C Oden
Sixth Man: Babbitt
Sixers:
PG Holiday
SG Turner
SF Iguodala
PF Young
C Hawes
Sixth Man: Williams
To me, those are pretty close to evenly matched. Portland definitely has the edge in the 4 and 5 spots but I think overall they are very close, with Portland having a slight edge.
Portland’s front office is also better, but not by that much this year with turnaround artist Doug Collins in Philly.
So, I do think Portland has the better future, but I think the 84%-16% score (when I wrote this anyways) is a little harsh towards the Sixers.
by beastispassword on Aug 25, 2010 11:15 PM PDT reply actions
IMO, we were ONLY able to get away with Thad at the 4 for two reasons. 1) solid pressure defense and 2)shotblocking in the middle.
But to be honest, we MISS Reggie Evans. We thought Elton Brand would be a 20/10 big(the 10 being more important here) 6.5 RPG doesn’t cut it. Without a disruptive force like Evans, this team literally falls apart. He created havoc defensively, he bumped his bodies into guys, he was a solid 2nd post defender that year.
Now there’s no Daly, no Evans and Brand’s coming off his worst year of his NBA career arguably at age 32. The Perimeter defense should be top-notched as we have potentially a PG-SG Duo that’s 6’4 and 6’6. Add in Iguodala at that 3 spot and we should look very good.
But are we good enough? The answer is to look at the NBA Finals and the Final-4 if you will, because that’s the goal of all 30 NBA teams. The Lakers and Celtics boost the following bigs:
Andrew Bynum
Pao Gasol
Kevin Garnett
Kendrick Perkins
Lamar Odom
Shaquille O’Neal(this yr signing)
Jermaine O’Neal(another signing)
Glen Baby Davis.
That’s just from TWO of the NBA Finals teams. The Magic have DH12 and Marcin Gortat
The Suns had Robin Lopez and then Amare Stoudemire.
Our best big is a choice of pick your poison: The guy who had the worst year of his NBA career. Or the raw project still developing named Spencer Hawes.
I’m VERY concerned about where we are as a team. Short of Speights pulling something out of his ass, our front-court sucks hard.
You could say our front-court sucks hard right now, but this is a “future” article, and nearly all of our front-court (obviously excluding Brand) is young and not at their prime yet.
If your opinion is true, we still can get away with Thad Young at the 4. Our pressure defense should still be very good and while we lost Dalembert blocking shots, Spencer Hawes blocked 1.2 per game in only 26 minutes, and like I have said, hes very young (22 right now.)
So, I think it’s fair to say the front-court is currently pretty weak, but definitely should improve, with Young, Speights, Hawes, and even Smith all being in their low-20s right now.
Our back-court (1-3 spots) is pretty much set and I’m not worried about them at all.
by beastispassword on Aug 28, 2010 1:57 PM PDT reply actions
Nothing wrong with scoring in my book—easiest way to win is if you score every possession.
However, not all of the big men are that one dimensional. Thad Young has averaged at least a steal per game in every season, and Speights+Hawes combined to average 10.2 rebounds per game in only 42.8 combined MPG. Again, these numbers aren’t that impressive, but their all bound to get better as these players start to peak.
Hawes and Young can also both shoot the three well for big men—Hawes is at a career 31.4% and Young at 34.3%. This is good because both don’t need to be clogging the lane in order to score points.
by beastispassword on Aug 29, 2010 8:32 PM PDT reply actions

by 















