Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: All Hail David Luiz

Sixers' Draft Profiles: Hassan Whiteside

*FYI these are ESPN's rankings, not mine. My personal rankings, along with Derek, Mike, and Tanner's can be found here.

#1 - John Wall  

#2 - Evan Turner

#3 - Derrick Favors

#4 - DeMarcus Cousins

#5 - Wesley Johnson

#6 - Al-Farouq Aminu

#7 - Ed Davis

#8 - Cole Aldrich

#9 - Greg Monroe

#10 - Daniel Orton

#11 - Ekpe Udoh

#12 - Hassan Whiteside

#13 - Donatas Motiejunas

#14 - Patrick Patterson

-------------------------

My boy Hassan Whiteside, after the jump!

Star-divide

Scouting Reports

DX:

Still raw offensively, but has upside.

Though he remains largely an unpolished prospect, particularly in terms of his footwork, post-moves and decision making ability, he shows flashes of potential in many different areas, namely his ability to put the ball on the floor, knock down mid-range jumpers and utilize his tremendous length to score inside.

Some might even say Ridiculous Upside.

... Whiteside gets to the free throw line at an excellent rate, converting 60% of his attempts once there, and does an outstanding job of crashing the offensive glass and finishing around the rim. He has very good touch around the basket, as well as from the perimeter (even knocking down a couple of 3-pointers this season), clearly showing better scoring instincts than your typically raw mid-major big man. The terrific extension he gets around the rim, excellent shooting mechanics and high-release point on his turnaround jumper all leave plenty of room for optimism regarding his offensive potential once he's able to fill out his lanky frame a bit.

His man-to-man defense is not very good at this point.

His main issue revolves around his extremely underdeveloped frame, which hinders him on the offensive end, but more importantly makes him a constant target for post-up plays and renders him an exceptionally poor man to man defender against average college big men. Whiteside gives up deep position in the post with the greatest of ease--seemingly not even fighting back at times-- getting out of his stance quickly, bringing his hands down, and downright giving up on plays, thinking he'll simply be able to recover and come up with a block, which at this level can indeed be the case on occasion.

But his rebounding and ability to block shots? Sheesh.

Whiteside possesses freakish length-his wingspan is reportedly around 7-6-and he has absolutely terrific timing rotating, contesting and rejecting shots. He's one of the most productive rebounders in college basketball for these same reasons.

Turnover prone and can't even spell pass.

Whiteside has dished out only 9 assists, a shockingly low number that ranks him amongst the worst in college basketball in that area. Watching him play, it's clear that once he touches the ball, he sees nothing besides the rim, often forcing up extremely poor shots and having major issues dealing with double teams, which makes him very turnover prone.

Whiteside's basketball IQ is not good.

Whiteside's fundamentals, basketball IQ and overall awareness are well below average, even considering his freshman status. He at times looks out of place in Marshall's half-court offense, looking as if he's not quite sure where he should be at any particular moment, which at this late stage in the season makes you wonder about his ability to process an NBA team's far more complex playbook.

Ah, the dreaded "red flags".

"Immature" is the word you hear most often associated with Whiteside both on and off the court, as there will certainly be a large degree of hand-holding and coddling that whichever team drafts him needs to do in order to help him reach his full potential. There are major questions about his work ethic and intensity level ...

ESPN:

Whiteside completes me. He had me at "pterodactyl-like wingspan" (rumored at 7'6'').

Whiteside is a terrific athlete with a pterodactyl-like wingspan who has been causing havoc in the lane with his shot-blocking and rebounding abilities. He's also showing some raw talent on the offensive end lately.

Mixed bag against better competition.

Whiteside didn't blow anyone away in the West Virginia game. He had 18 points, 6 rebounds and 2 blocks, and although the execs and scouts who saw him play liked what they saw, they weren't wowed, either. That changed a bit in the Memphis game. Whiteside was terrific, scoring 22 points, grabbing 8 boards and blocking 7 shots.

A GM's scouting report:

"Think a young, skinny Camby with a jumper. He doesn't board as well as Camby, but he has his shot-blocking ability, build and a tendency to spend time away from the paint. He needs another 20 pounds of strength and has to play harder. He can run but rarely does."

Comparisons

NBADraft.net - Marcus Camby/Tyson Chandler

YouTube

Whiteside College Mix

Whiteside College Mix Part 2

Whiteside College Mix Part 3

My take:

What can I say, I'm a big Whiteside fan. I'm a sucker for athletic shot blockers. It's one of the reasons I bought a Sam Dalembert jersey when he was drafted. Based on potential alone, Hassan is top 3 player in this draft, but because of the red flags, he'll probably go somewhere in the 10-15 range. Will he ever work hard enough to reach his potential? Will he always have an attitude problem? Will his basketball IQ always be low? These are questions teams are going to have to answer before they even think of drafting Whiteside. 

His skill set is a great fit with the Sixers, and he's essentially the perfect Sam replacement. Is drafting him six too high? Most likely. Would I be upset if the Sixers drafted him anyway? Absolutely not. Once you get past WTF/Cousins it's pretty much a crapshoot, so I wouldn't be mad if the Sixers took the guy with the highest potential. Once teams start working players out, conducting interviews and background checks, Whiteside's stock could potentially sky-rocket. I could also potentially change my mind. You can also potentially disagree with my potential opinion. Tune in next month to see if potential is reached!

Up next: Donatas Motiejunas

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I wouldn’t mind drafting him at 6 as the BPPA (best potential player available), but that’s mainly because I’m not high on the other guys projected to be available at 6, so I would first try to trade down. Can’t agree though with the part about him being a Sam replacement. With Whiteside’s current size and frame, it’s highly unlikely that he is going to play defensive NBA center on his first NBA contract. And by the time of second contract, even if he fills out, he will probably be either a bust or require a Sam like contract to keep. So for the Sixers he would be a project that would project as a possible replacement for Brand when Brand’s contract expires.

by izimbra on May 16, 2010 10:28 AM PDT reply actions  

At 6 Whiteside and Aminu are close for me.

Sam isn’t the greatest man-to-man defender, but his weakside defense and defensive rebounding are excellent. Whiteside projects to be able to do both. He will have to add strength and improve his fundamentals in man-to-man, but if he can be an average man defender, I think he can make a similar impact to Sam.

And on offense, Whiteside can run the floor and catch oops like Sam, plus he has more offensive potential.

by Jordan Sams on May 16, 2010 11:54 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

He has the long term potential to be better than Sam at either PF or C but my point is that during his first NBA contract he apparently won’t be able to play defense C against even mediocre NBA centers weighing 40 lbs. more than him and with much lower center of gravity, or they will be catching the ball right under the basket and scoring at a high percentage. We’re not going to draft him unless we are going to play him some, and so when he plays, he would play at PF. From the film I’ve seen, I give him as good or better chance of developing a good outside shot as of developing a physical man to man defense, and a poor man’s KG is more valuable than a rich man’s Camby anyway. For all those reasons, it makes more sense to me to call him a tall NBA PF at this stage in his development.

by izimbra on May 16, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

what’s that word people use when trying to describe a player’s possible outcome and capable of being? i just can’t think of it

by Tanner Steidel on May 16, 2010 11:35 AM PDT reply actions  

Y’know, picking at 6 in a 5-guy draft, and as bad as this team is, maybe you invest in “ridiculous upside”. He clearly has it. If we were a better team, and maybe only needed solid contributors to plug in around a young star, I might go a different direction…maybe even He Whose Name Must Not Be Spoken, Particularly By Stefanski On Draft Night. The problem is, the closest thing we have to a young star is a guy who needs a closer to defer to. While a young pass-first PG who defends and knocks down a decent percentage of his Js is a super-de-duper nice foundation building block, his very selflessness requires them to put fancier pieces around him than might be required around a more scoring-oriented player.

Now, do I wish Whiteside was more filled-out? Yeah. I’m not sure this is the guy you can stick next to Speights and call it a front-court. Someone out there has to defend the low post and vacuum the boards.

But while I wouldn’t normally take him at 6, I do think he is exactly the kind of swing-for-the-fences gamble this team needs to take to return to sustainable respectability.

by dweebowitz on May 16, 2010 12:54 PM PDT reply actions  

He would be a force if gets even half of the muscle mass Dwight Howard got when he entered the league.

by prideoux on May 16, 2010 2:00 PM PDT reply actions  

If he’s the best player available come draft time, sure, take him.
However, I think this team has enough players with low basketball IQ who don’t pass. We need a guy who is coachable, can defend the post and run the floor.
As of right now I’ll pass on him and his pterodactyl-esque qualities.

by jefu on May 16, 2010 6:25 PM PDT reply actions  

The more I read about the prospects after the “top 5”, the more disheartened I feel about this years draft. Where would a player such as Marreese Speights have gone in this years draft? Or Thaddeus Young?

I don’t want to see us draft a high risk, high reward type player. But I also dislike the idea of drafting some such as Cole Aldrich. The more I think about it, the more I want to see us try and trade up into the top 4 or trade out of this years draft altogether.

I can accept that th 6’ers aren’t going anywhere in the next 3 years. That’s just the reality of the club we support. But there’s nothing worse for a club to be picking 6th in a 5 player draft.

by briztoon on May 17, 2010 7:45 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree, but I have a top 6. I’ve bumped Aminu into that “I’d be extremely happy to have” group. I talked with some of my cohorts at DX who have attended Aminu’s training sessions with Dave Hopla and they’re very encouraged by his work ethic and improved form on his jumper.

by Derek Bodner on May 17, 2010 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I think there’s a big difference in Aminu and Davis/Aldrich. That’s why staying at 6 is so crucial, assuming no top 3.

by Jordan Sams on May 17, 2010 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools


Editor

Morris_small Jordan Sams

Sharone_wright_sixers_small Michael Levin

Associate Editor

Lourdre2_small Tanner Steidel

Twitter_small Derek Bodner

Contributor

Autographed-photo-ben-rivera-phillies1_05ba981348520854b79233eacee8eeee_small Dave Rueter