Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Pacquiao vs Bradley: Potential Undercard Fighters

Sixers' Coaching Search: The Seven Candidates

The Sixers have now interviewed seven candidates to be their next head coach. My two favorite candidates  -- Mike Budenholzer and Tom Thibodeau -- have not yet been contacted by the team. My preliminary wish list after the jump ...

Star-divide

1. Elston Turner - Turner has studied under a successful head coach in Rick Adelman for 9 years, and according to Chris Mannix, Turner "served as Adelman's chief game strategist and organized the Rockets' game plans during the 2008 playoffs". I can only assume he did the same for the Rockets semi-successful run in the 2009 playoffs, when they upset the favored Portland Trail Blazers in six, and took the world champion LA Lakers to seven games. Mannix also writes, "Turner is considered a strong communicator who has embraced Adelman's read-and-react offensive system."

The only thing working against Turner at this point is the "read-and-react offense", which is very similar to the Princeton Offense. After the Eddie Jordan era, the last thing this team needs is another offense like the Princeton, but I trust Turner's ability to adapt his system for a specific roster, rather than adapting a roster to fit his system -- much like his mentor Adelman has done throughout his career. 

2. Sam Mitchell - Mitchell is 46 and has four full years as a head coach under his belt. He coached the Raptors from '04-'08, accumulating a 156-189 record in the process. Since, and prior to his job with the Raptors he's been an assistant in numerous places, most notably in Minnesota during the KG era. However; my interest in Mitchell has nothing to do with his past experience, but rather the things he said in an interview with Dei Lynam. Most note-worthy quotes:

"Just give [Sam Dalembert] his defined role," he explained. "Play him 35-38 minutes a night. Tell him to go get every rebound and block shot out there and if he fouls out in the process so be it. Just show him love."

"If I saw Iguodala attempt more then two threes in a game, I would cry," he said. He went on to add that Iguodala should be attempting double figure free-throw attempts as opposed to long jumpers.

3. Monty Williams - Williams was the guy I suggested the Sixers hire when I wrote Sixers Blueprint for Success 2.0. He's been a Trail Blazers' assistant for the past five years, and also an intern in San Antonio for a year. If hired, Williams would become the youngest coach in the NBA (38). The catch is, no 38 year-old receiving his first job is going to set the world on fire. The Sixers would have to be patient with Williams and anticipate some bumps along the way. I'm not sure they're wiling to do so.

4. Avery Johnson - Johnson has a lot going for him. He's young (45 years old), he has an absurd winning percentage in the regular season (.735, 194-70 career record), and already has a Coach of the Year award under his belt. The problems with Avery are, his teams have failed in the playoffs (23-24, including being on the wrong end of one of the biggest upsets in playoff history), he's rumored to have a massive ego, and he said some questionable things about the Sixers roster during a radio interview last off-season. The cons outweigh the pros in Avery's case, but he still remains an intriguing candidate.

5. Dan Majerle - Majerle (44) carries the most unknowns of the candidates on this list. He's been an assistant with the Suns for the past two years, and most known for his nickname, Thunder Dan. It's hard to tell what kind of coach Majerle will be, which is why I have him so low on my list, paired with the fact that he's only been an assistant for two years. The best thing about hiring Majerle is he believes the Sixers should play "fast", and he's right.

"They're talented," Majerle said. "They've got a lot of similarities to the way [the Suns are] set up. I think they're looking to play fast, which is probably one of the reasons they talked to me. With that personnel, they probably should play fast."

6. Bill Laimbeer - Laimbeer (53) is currently an assistant with the T'Wolves, but is most known for his tenure as a Detroit "Bad Boy" and his success as a WNBA head coach. He was the Coach/GM of the Detroit Shock for seven years, and won three championships during that time. Still yet to land a head coaching gig in the NBA, the Sixers would be Bill's first. Kate Fagan put 5-1 odds on Laimbeer becoming the Sixers next head coach, saying this:

Laimbeer could be an interesting candidate. You know he's going to demand a lot from his players, given his track record both as a player and in the WNBA. He's had a tough time getting his foot in the NBA coaching door, but he's had success whenever he's been given a coaching opportunity. Laimbeer has the potential combination of being able to raise people's interest in the Sixers, while also being a candidate with a whole lot of upside.

7. Doug Collins - Two recent articles (here and here) hint at Collins being the odds-on favorite to be the Sixers' next head coach. As you can tell by my wish list, the thought of Collins does not please me. I'll write more about DC in the coming days, since it's rumored the job might be his after the Lakers/Suns series.

Poll
Who you want?
Doug Collins
56 votes
Sam Mitchell
49 votes
Avery Johnson
76 votes
Dan Majerle
21 votes
Bill Laimbeer
71 votes
Monty Williams
16 votes
Elston Turner
25 votes

314 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 33 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Pat Williams

was on with Eskin this afternoon. It is worth listening to the podcast. Anyway, in reference to coaching, his thoughts are:

1. Need to get a coach with experience and leadership.

2. He said that there are alot of very good assistants. got the impression that he thinks they need to go w/ a retread not a new guy.

3. He thinks this team is better than many think they are these days.

by DeanH on May 14, 2010 4:38 PM PDT reply actions  

Off-Topic

But check out Doug Gotlieb’s big board. He has both Gordon Hayward and Luke Babbitt over Cousins … Turner at 4?

by Jordan Sams on May 14, 2010 6:00 PM PDT reply actions  

gotta have insider… booooooo

not very trusting of doug gottlieb’s rankings for nba draft – he has paul george at 22 – not cool

by Tanner Steidel on May 14, 2010 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

He has Luke Babbitt at 8 for goodness sake.

by Jordan Sams on May 14, 2010 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Worst write-up I’ve ever seen. I guess making ridiculous projections is one way to drive traffic.

by Derek Bodner on May 15, 2010 12:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

paul george 1st overall – i’m feelin it

by Tanner Steidel on May 15, 2010 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t know why, but I really dislike Avery Johnson. Actually yeah, I do know why, it’s that freakin big ego combined with that squeaky voice. I never liked him while he was at the Mavs, and I don’t want him any where near thr Sixers.

I’m intrigued by Bill Laimbeer, but at this stage I like Sam Mitchell. Unlike many, I like Sam Dalembert, and I like Mitchell’s view of Sammy D and how to coach him. Also I’d try and resign Sammy D after this season.

by briztoon on May 14, 2010 9:16 PM PDT reply actions  

Squeaky yes.
Ego yes.

But Avery = wins, better ticket sales, instant respect of the players, a style of play that fits this roster, and a guy who will confidently let the front office know when they are being stupid. (we apparently need that here).

I don’t get why this article references his comments in the past about the Sixers as questionable, because I thought they were pretty solid. Maybe there were more comments that I don’t know about.
For example:
1) He said Thad was a 4 in this league…..not a 3…..time and multiple experiments thus far in his career have shown that Thad is more effective as an undersized 4 than a normal sized 3. So I don’t see how Avery can be faulted for those comments.
2) Early last season, he implored Eddie Princeton to dump the Princeton offense. He was right. What I like most about what he said was that a coach can have his philosophies, but at the end of the day has to adjust to what is working. Having seen too many coaches in multiple sports married to their personal philosophies to a fault, I love a head coach who has the common sense to adjust to the strengths and weaknesses of the roster.
3) His comments last offseason about knowing when to party showed me he can provide leadership in the locker room that some of the players may need.

Meanwhile, Sam Mitchell says that Dalembert should get 35+ min/night? And somehow this guy is suddenly a guru? I’m sorry, but that comment instantly disqualified him for me. Sammy is a 15 to 25 min/night player in this league on a good team. He constantly gets abused defending the high screen. His defensive rotations are often times questionable. His lateral agility/quickness on rotations is poor. If the rest of the team is playing strong defense around Sammy, then he is a solid big to plug into the lane. But he is very overrated as a defensive big man. For cryin’ out loud, the Sixers were generally better on both ends of the floor when over the hill Theo Ratliff was in the game back in the 08-09 season.

And everyone knows that Iggy needs to shoot less threes…….what coach with sanity wouldn’t design the offense so that Iggy did not end up with a ton of open spot up 3 point attempts? But publicly questioning the shot selection of the team’s best player strikes me as unwise. That is usually better addressed behind the scenes. If it wasn’t for the Princeton offense coupled with some questionable moves by the GM, Iggy’s shot selection wouldn’t have been a huge issue for the team anyway. Sometimes I think we were spoiled in this town by how often AI used to go to the line. Over the course of an 82 game season, I don’t need to see Iggy go to the line a ton in the 1st and 2nd quarters to assert his will as a scorer. Ideally, someone else should be generally leading the scoring early in the game for this team.

by wannabgm on May 14, 2010 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

what about his claim last offseason that he felt lou could be a legitimate starting pg in the nba?

by Tanner Steidel on May 15, 2010 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Considering they had no other PG on the roster at the time, I don’t think that comment was way off the mark. Also Avery is a bit unorthodox in that he has been known to start the game with one PG and finish with another. A young Devin Harris often started for him but didn’t necessarily get 30 min/game, for example.

Lou as a starting PG is obviously not ideal. But I don’t think it’s impossible depending on what you have on your roster. Also, I think Johnson would have gotten much more out of Lou on both ends of the floor than Lou’s previous head coaches. If he didn’t, Jrue would have been starting before the season was over, because Johnson is not afraid to make a rotation change when warranted.

by wannabgm on May 15, 2010 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

Meanwhile, Sam Mitchell says that Dalembert should get 35+ min/night? And somehow this guy is suddenly a guru? I’m sorry, but that comment instantly disqualified him for me. Posted by by wannabgm on May 14, 2010 11:50 PM

Actually it was the stuff you left out that I liked.

“Just give [Sam Dalembert] his defined role,” he explained. “Play him 35-38 minutes a night. Tell him to go get every rebound and block shot out there and if he fouls out in the process so be it. Just show him love.”

Now I’ll use your arguement from below, considering they have no other C on the roster at the time, of course you play Sammy D 35-38 minutes a game. Like I said, I dislike Avery Johnson, so of those interviewed I have to pick Mitchell. I really like Bill Laimbeer, but don’t like putting my neck for controversial choices unless I have a very strong belief and inside knowledge of the person.

by briztoon on May 15, 2010 3:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

There’s a difference between starting, and playing someone 35 minutes/night. The Sixers had little choice but to start Sammy, but at that point in time it was understandable to think that Lou might be able to become a starting PG. It was not at that time, and still is not today remotely true that Sammy could be a 30 min/night player….even with the roster the way it was.

Even with the roster the way it is now, he is not a 30 min/night player…..let alone 35-38. He averaged 25 min the last two years…..and shouldn’t have been on the court for a single minute more.

by wannabgm on May 15, 2010 7:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Why the F does everyone want Avery Johnson? If you voted for him, please explain.

by Jordan Sams on May 14, 2010 11:19 PM PDT reply actions  

I just did above…probably a bit too forcefully. I was impressed with what he did with the Mavs. I know he inherited an already talented roster, but he took it to new heights, and utilized his roster well. As good as Dirk is, it’s not easy to go deep in the playoffs with him as your only top dawg. And I think he squeezed more defense out of that roster than most head coaches.

There’s no way AJ gets hired here anyway….I’m probably wasting my time. I think Stefansky wouldn’t put someone in that position who is likely to take away his power within the organization unless it’s a favorite of Ed Snyder…..like Larry Brown.

by wannabgm on May 15, 2010 12:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

What do you think about his sub-par playoff record, or getting blatantly out-coached in a 1-8 match-up?

by Jordan Sams on May 15, 2010 12:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

04-05 he lost to a Suns team in the second round that won 62 games.
The series went 6 games, and the Suns won the last one in OT.

05-06 he went to the finals and lost to the better team.

06-07 ouch. He should have found a way for his team to perform better in that series. In his defense, that Nellie team was the most dangerous low seeded 1st round draw I’ve ever seen. And in hindsight, that team matched(and maybe surpassed) Dallas’ roster on talent.

07-08 He lost to the better team. Dallas had the bigger name and the bigger named players, but that Hornets team had the most dominant player (Paul), and the better defensive roster. He also had to deal with appeasing an over the hill Jason Kidd who was abused by Paul on both ends, and an overbearing owner who traded away Devin Harris(who was getting 30 min. per game at that point) for a star past his prime in mid-season. Someone had to go. It wasn’t going to be the owner or the player who was just traded for. Judging by the comments from the players and the owner after the firing, I think that they knew it maybe wasn’t deserved.

07-08

by wannabgm on May 15, 2010 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh yeah, I forgot his team blew a 2-0 lead, leading by (20)? in game 3 in the finals.

All sound like excuses to me. If he constantly failed with the Mavs roster, how would he do with the Sixers roster?

Regardless, my main knocks on him are his ego and the questionable stuff he says on tv. I think I read somewhere that he said the nets are guarnteed the number two pick? I know that sounds like a stupid thing to knock, but he says thing like that all the time. I just can’t think of any more examples at the moment.

by Jordan Sams on May 15, 2010 2:29 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

That was Dwayne Wade pre-injury and Shaq(who still had a little left in the tank for a playoff run) that Johnson ran into. Miami had the best player of the entire NBA playoffs and certainly the best of that series in Wade. They had a sidekick star player in Shaq. They had Mourning coming off the bench to play whatever minutes his kidney would allow…..and he still had a lot left in the tank compared to Shaq. For 20 min or so a night, Mourning gave minutes about as good as when he was in his prime.

So with the Mourning-Shaq combo they had essentially the best center in the game plus the best player in the game at that point in Wade. Then they had multiple role players who could hit the 3 and play defense. You do realize Johnson took them 6 games….it was a series at least. And they lost to the better team. I’m not sure anyone could have coached Dallas to defeat that Miami squad.

by wannabgm on May 15, 2010 7:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

He still lost to the 8TH SEED THE NEXT YEAR. No excuses, I don’t want him in Philadelphia.

Bring in a new, young guy. We know what we get with re-treads and it will not get us a championship.

by guitarmouse35 on May 15, 2010 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wanna be’s never really know what they’re talking about – they’re wannabes

by jemagee on May 16, 2010 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Rk Player Salary
1 Baron Davis $15,070,000
2 Jason Richardson $9,999,999
3 Adonal Foyle $8,125,000
4 Al Harrington $7,625,000
5 Stephen Jackson $6,120,000
6 Sarunas Jasikevicius $4,000,000
7 Mickael Pietrus $2,535,260
8 Zarko Cabarkapa $2,157,097
9 Patrick O’Bryant $2,061,720
10 Andris Biedrins $1,986,960
11 Dajuan Wagner $771,331
12 Matt Barnes $771,331
13 Josh Powell $744,551
14 Andre Owens $676,800
15 Monta Ellis $664,209
16 Chris Taft $664,209
17 Devin Brown $500,000
18 Anthony Roberson $267,111
19 Kelenna Azubuike $251,657
20 Renaldo Major $20,133

That was a pretty talented roster. Baron Davis was a better crunch time go to guy than Dirk at that point in time. He had a young but explosive Monta Ellis with him in the back court as well as several good role players/scorers. While Johnson could have done a better job in that series, I’m not sure Dallas was the better team despite the big regular season winning percentage.

Another question you have to ask is how many of these coaches we think are the next resident genius would have done better than Avery with that Dallas team. Sometimes, it feels like Avery was a victim of his own regular season success. I don’t see Larry Brown winning as many games or going much deeper in the playoffs with those Dallas teams, for example.

by wannabgm on May 15, 2010 8:22 AM PDT reply actions  

How many legit big men you see in that list?

Bottom line is Avery choked and thought that he could play small ball and still win an up tempo kind of game, which they didn’t play all season. That’s why they lost.

by packimop on May 17, 2010 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Biedrins was decent back then. The big German was more in love with fancy spin moves taking his man off the dribble at that point in time than he was with his mid range game or low post moves.

 I know Johnson did not do a good job in that series. But I believe he got more out of that team than most coaches would with the exception of that one series. If you give him a poor grade on that series(which he prob deserves) then don’t you also have to give him a high grade on taking that team to the finals and almost winning 3 games(i think one was decided by a point in overtime if I remember correctly). They defeated both Phoenix and San Antonio on the way to the finals in Johnson’s first full season with the team.

I don’t think it’s fair to say that he couldn’t lead a team to a title.

by wannabgm on May 18, 2010 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

This would be the coolest starting 5.

Sarunas Jasikevicius
Zarko Cabarkapa
Dajuan Wagner
Renaldo Major
Patrick O’Bryant

by Jordan Sams on May 17, 2010 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

I’m starting to feel a bit of Sam Mitchell love. At least, since there is no Budenholzer, Thibodeau, or Casey. I would be OK with Monty, Majerle, or Turner. I am tired of these pointless rehashings of mediocre coaches who are more interested in stuffing a roster into their “proven system” than working with the players that are here.

But I’ve said this all before, and there’s nothing anyone here can do about it….unless someone has a secret photo of Stefanski doing naughties.

Naughty Stefanski pictures, anyone? :)

by dweebowitz on May 15, 2010 6:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Or Larry Brown. I don’t want Larry Brown, either. And Avery Johnson doesn’t exactly pump my ‘nads, either, although I suppose he’s the best option of the Big Three. Seriously. Did they learn nothing from the Eddie Jordan fiasco?

by dweebowitz on May 16, 2010 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

If I had naughty Stefanski pictures it’s much more likely that I’d kill myself than use them to force him to make the moves that I want him to.

by yosoysean on May 15, 2010 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

i’d use them to the degree that willie green uses them – to get some pt

by Tanner Steidel on May 15, 2010 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah…you’ll know I got the goods when they 1) hire an outside-the-box coach, and 2) you look on your TV and see a bald, slightly pudgy, middle-aged white PG bring it up the floor for the Sixers….

by dweebowitz on May 16, 2010 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hey! I’m not bald yet. Man, I better find out where Shane Heal is at and get some practice in.

by briztoon on May 16, 2010 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Autographed-photo-ben-rivera-phillies1_05ba981348520854b79233eacee8eeee_small
Remember this Guy: Jerald Honeycutt

Recent FanPosts

Small
Sound decisions are paying off
Et_small
ESPN 25 Under 25: Young & Holiday
Small
Hollinger: What's the Sixers ceiling?
Small
Best for Sixers to avoid Heat
Small
Some love for the BUST!!!!
Small
Curmudgeon's Lawn: They Still Suck, Sometimes...
Small
Heat surge burns Sixers
Small
Keeping guys on the bench for so long in the third quarter is a problem
Sixers_640_small
Trades for Sixers brought up on ESPN 5-on-5
Small
The 76ers anthem/theme song is pure fun.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

137711075_small Jordan Sams

Sharone_wright_sixers_small Michael Levin

Associate Editor

Mo_small Tanner Steidel

Twitter-4_small Derek Bodner