Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Can I Get A Link, Link: Sixers Coaching and Draft Style

Can I link it in the morning, without giving you half of my dough and even worse if I was broke would you read me?  If I couldn't get you finer things like all of them diamond rings Ben16 kills for, would you still roll?

The coaching search is still moving along and I have not yet been contacted for an interview (not giving up hope yet!).  Despite my bitterness towards that blatant disrespect of my leadership and coaching skills, I'll play through it and give you all what you love (probably hate) more than Kel loves Orange Soda; links!

We got some good stuff for you guys and gals today with coaching updates and some draft analysis including the heavily debated DeMarcus Cousins Attitude Issues (DCAI - not District of Columbia Artificial Intelligence).  Hit em up while I go get me some of that grape drink (sugar, water, and of course, purple).

Links today are pretty lengthy today so hit the jump to if you're interested (I think you should...peer pressure).

Star-divide

Stefanski Met with Bill Laimbeer and Sam Mitchell on Sunday

An assistant with the Minnesota Timberwolves, the 52-year-old Laimbeer won three WNBA titles as coach of the Detroit Shock.

Mitchell, 46, was named the NBA coach of the year in 2006-07, when he directed the Toronto Raptors to a 47-35 record. The Raptors dismissed him early in the 2008-09 season. His record in Toronto was 156-189.

"Certainly Bill Laimbeer's credentials as a player and success as a coach . . . speak for themselves," Stefanski said. "Sam has been a successful head coach in the league." 

More on Laimbeer and Mitchell

"Sam has been a successful head coach in the league, having been named coach of the year in 2007, and we were very interested in speaking with him," Stefanski said. "It was good to sit down with him to exchange ideas about our team and this opportunity."

"We want to speak to as many qualified candidates as possible... We want to thank Bill for meeting with us."

Much like his quote regarding Avery Johnson's interview last week with the Sixers, this one stands out to me as, "We wanted to see what he could offer and it's not what we want at this time.  He will not be our coach next season."

Today, Stefanski and his group will meet with Phoenix Suns assistant Dan Majerle and Portland TrailBlazers assistant Monty Williams.  

DeMarcus Cousins and Character Issues

HT: John

"There isn’t anybody in the NBA with the same physical characteristics that he has,’’ Greig said. "If ESPN and John Calipari hadn’t had blue pompoms out for Wall all year and they had equally praised both players, who would be No. 1? The teams that had done their proper homework, they would take him No. 1.’’

"When you draft a guy that high, you are hoping that you get some level of maturity,’’ said an Eastern Conference scout, "unless the talent outweighs whatever concerns you might have, which is very rare. I am not so certain all the teams feel [Cousins’s] talent would outweigh the character and maturity issues.’’  

"The fact that we are even talking about this means that there’s something out there,’’ the Eastern Conference scout said. "The other guys in his range do not have this concern."

"The other issue is his weight. He played — I think if you ask most NBA people — he played an entire season out of shape. He played successfully. He’s going to have to convince teams that not only can he get to a certain weight but that he wants to."

"John Wall’s rolling around in a Range Rover right now; good for him. DeMarcus isn’t rolling around in anything. You ask him what he wants to do with his money — ‘Save,’ he said. Anything that’s been said about off the court is plain wrong.’’ (Quote from Cousins' Agent, Greig)

Kate Fagan Breaks Down Lottery Implications

Without a fortuitous bounce, the Sixers will remain a mismatched roster with no coach, a franchise run by a general manager without ownership's backing, a team that continues to be one of the NBA's least desirable locations for free agents.

Essentially, the Sixers are like a gambler who has hit bottom. Either the final bet with their final dollar - a flier taken on the roulette wheel while shuffling out of the casino - will miraculously resurrect them, or they'll be forced to do it the old-fashioned way: through a decent draft pick, trades, maneuvering, good coaching, some game-planning, and of course, hard work.

Shooting guard is the more pressing need, but because Ohio State's Evan Turner is a near-lock to be drafted at No. 2, and since the Sixers have a habit of drafting not by need but by best available, it's likely they'd consider Cole Aldrich, a 6-foot-11 center from Kansas.

That combination of big-man talent and Dalembert's expiring contract might leave Sixers brass with no choice but to select a big man and then forge into the NBA's off-season wilderness with the single-minded focus of getting a starting shooting guard.

5 Players Sixers Should Stay Away From

This is Bleacher Report so take it as it is but can still start discussion...

Cole Aldrich:

Aldrich is the poster child for a team picking cautiously, not aggressively. He appears like a lock to last a decade in the NBA after three years and a national title under Bill Self at Kansas, but his ceiling is often being compared to that of Joel Przybilla's (with better offense).

If the Sixers aren't in the mood to take risks in this draft and want a safe pick, Aldrich is about as safe as you can get at No. 6. If they want to give themselves a real chance at contending in the next five years, they'll cross Aldrich off their draft board very early in the process.

Ed Davis:

It's hard to imagine a reason they should spend such a high pick on another one (PF), unless he's the Kevin Durant of power forwards.

Still, the Sixers have much more pressing needs than a fourth power forward. Since Davis isn't a sure-fire All-Star, the Sixers should look elsewhere with the pick.

Al-Farouq Aminu:

Unfortunately, he also shot below 30 percent from downtown in his two years at Wake, and at only 205 pounds, he's not yet strong enough to play the four in the NBA. The Sixers are already stacked with inconsistent three-point shooting wingmen—with Andre Iguodala, Thaddeus Young, and Rodney Carney all on the roster.

The last thing they need is a Thad Young clone when Iggy's jacking up 28-foot bricks as last-second shots next season.

Greg Monroe:

Sadly, the Sixers lit $80 million on fire by signing Brand two years ago, a week after drafting Speights. The logjam that's existed at the position ever since leaves no room for spending a high pick on a power forward, even one as talented as Monroe.

Ekpe Udoh:

The biggest problem with Udoh is the fact that his offensive game is a work very much in progress. Could the Sixers afford pairing Udoh with Dalembert and get away with it offensively? When Dalembert leaves, can a pairing of Udoh and Speights in the frontcourt make up for each others' respective offensive and defensive liabilities?

Until the Sixers can win 30 games in a season again, they're in no position to be drafting for luxury with the No. 6 pick. 

Comment 54 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Bleacher REport is rapidly becoming the howard eskin of sports blogs to me.

Anything they say – the opposite is most likely true

by jemagee on May 10, 2010 10:09 AM PDT reply actions  

i normally am the same way but i think they make a good point with aldrich, aminu, and monroe with this one

by Tanner Steidel on May 10, 2010 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with most of the players he says to stay away from, but I find the reasonings for it nearly comical.

by Derek Bodner on May 10, 2010 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

was told that Sam Mitchell was VERY impressive in his interview and they are very high on him.

by sixerfan1976 on May 10, 2010 1:43 PM PDT reply actions  

I was told that it feels good when ladies touch your butthole during fellacio but I’m not broadcasting that, now am I?

by Michael Levin on May 10, 2010 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is this the same joke insider that I have seen on other sites?

by YoSixers on May 10, 2010 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nope, entirely different joke insider that you’ve seen on other sites with the exact same screen name.

Feel free to ignore the comment or ‘negative’ rate it.

by jemagee on May 10, 2010 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

He become my primary choice candidate after being the only prospective candidate who had comments about the sixers roster attributed to him that weren’t, you know, stupid

by jemagee on May 10, 2010 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Random Thought

Do the current Sixers have a higher ceiling than this year’s Atlanta Hawks? Because if this is what they’re building for, why not start from scratch?

by Jordan Sams on May 10, 2010 5:17 PM PDT reply actions  

I’d say Jrue has a higher ceiling and depending on his performance next season, the sixers will look to build around him and possibly this year’s draft pick.

I haven’t been able to watch this playoff series, but I would assume the sixers last year had a better strategy than this Hawks team.

by jefu on May 10, 2010 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

How much better of a core do you think Jrue, Andre, Wesley Johnson are than Johnson, Smith and Horford?

Maybe the Sixers had a better strategy, but maybe the Magic are just better. That’s what it seems like to me.

by Jordan Sams on May 10, 2010 7:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, they didn’t have Jameer last year, but Turk created more match up problems.

It’s hard to compare a PG/SF/SG with a SG/PF/C, but I would say yes. It’s how well they work together as a team that matters more, and from what I’ve been reading, this Hawks core has some issues with their coach. I think Jrue and Iguodala have and will continue to work together beautifully, insert Wesley Johnson who can shoot and doesn’t need the ball to be effective and you can create a nice threesome (no, not that).

by jefu on May 10, 2010 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

The twams with the top superstars have a chance at being contenders

The Sixers have no superstar.

The Hawks have better players, but are in the same boat.

So yes, until either team gets a top 5 player, or 3 top 20 players, they will be on the outside looking in. Fair to say the Hawks and Sixers are the ceiling and floor of the same situation. Something Ed Stefanski willfully ignores.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wish we were a better "twam."

Short of that, I’d like to be able to edit my posts, because I am too lazy to proofread.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

just out of curiosity, is there a certain established list you are referencing? (top 5 or 3 of top 20) For example, Slam…

by jefu on May 10, 2010 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, but there are 15 players on the All NBA 1st-2nd-3rd teams. So top 5 would be Lebron/Kobe/Howard/Durant/Wade based on 1st team All-NBA this year.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-NBA_Team#2004.E2.80.9305

To be fair, #12-#30 are probably pretty close. Iguodala could be a top 20 player, although I would put him in the mid 20’s.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

The next 5 top vote getters:
Bosh
Rondo
Lee
Boozer
Billups

21-26
Randolph
Horford
Kidd
Rose
Paul
Gimobli

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 8:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

it’s mostly debatable, but I would say most peoples’ top 50, or even top 40 would include almost the same players.
I think Iguodala has top 25 potential, but it’s hard to rank him this high after having a bad season (in terms of shooting and trying to carry the team).

by jefu on May 10, 2010 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Team Iguodala up with another legit star or two and people would put him up into the 20’s.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Even if Iguodala is a top 20 player, where are the other two going to come from?

by Jordan Sams on May 10, 2010 9:10 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yup. So if we are going to stink, why not do whatever is necessary to get the right building blocks. That is why a LB style Bobcats rebuild would be a waste.

Nothing wrong with trying to go from average to good, or to try and hold on a bity longer if you are the Spurs/mavs/celtics. But if you already stink, there is no reason to do anything but a full rebuild until you land a superstar- even if that takes some teams forever.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

we stank under Jordan who couldn’t coach games nor manage players effectively.
In reality, I’d say this roster is very much mediocre for the time being.

by jefu on May 10, 2010 9:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

But definitely limited upside unless they draft an All-NBA type player.

Say Jrue ends up almost as good as Iguodala (a reach) and the guy they draft also ends up that level. That could make for a 50 win team with the right coach and chemistry. Sort of like the Hawks.

Or best case, in a few years you trade 1 top player and a big expiring for a disgruntled superstar and make a run.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the best case you mentioned is what they can do. When Elton comes off the books, you still have a very young Jrue and Iguodala in his prime. Depending on where the team goes from here and who is coaching, etc, the sixers might actually look attractive to free agents.

by jefu on May 10, 2010 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

More best case…

Well say Jrue at 22 is like Rondo now. Iguodala at 29 like Pierce now,,,

Maybe this year’s pick will end up as good as Ray Allen right now (say Wes Johnson.) So that star vet addition better be very good- especially if you will likely have to give up one of you top young players to get them.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

say a package of Young,/Speights,/future draft picks for Kevin Garnett?

by jefu on May 10, 2010 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe the KG equivalent. Say if Bosh or Howard end up on capped out teams that can’t get out of the 1st round. maybe one of those teams decides to blow things up.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

But that is almost asking for a “Shaq to LA” type trade. That’s even less likely then finding a top player in the lottery.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

to be honest, I’d be more interested in using some of our young players (that hopefully mature to be more complete players) and our inevitable mediocre-level draft pick to trade down for a NBA-ready high draft pick ( I know it’s a stretch).

by jefu on May 10, 2010 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure if any of WTF-Cuz end up as top 10 NBA stars, but if this is their only year were they can trade into the top 3 they have to try and do it. No reason to look to get mediocre.

I just wish I was higher on the top 5. maybe Wall becomes a superstar- but I doubt it. And the others look to be more all-star as opposed to superstar level players.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would try and follow Pritchard’s lead. Make trades to get future unrestricted #1 picks from poorly run teams who think they will be good down the road.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

say a year from now Thad has developed into a nice bench player with improved defense, ball handling. You also have Lou who has shown 6th man abilities and seems to be more loved elsewhere than here. Perhaps Speights improves his game.
Wouldn’t some of these players look attractive to teams if we package maybe one or two to trade down to a top five team?
We have too many redundant players, but other teams don’t. Maybe to a desperate team it would look more attractive to make a trade where you know the type of player you are getting as opposed to gambling and striking out again and again.

by jefu on May 10, 2010 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

if this happens, that would give us two high draft picks plus cap space the following summer. That certainly seems more optimistic than where this team is now.

by jefu on May 10, 2010 9:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah. I think smarter management could have positioned the Sixers to be like that right now. Say we would have passed on Brand and instead gotten Camby, who is now coming off the books.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 10:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

What’s killing the team now is Iguodala/Brand/Dalembert contracts combined.
Once Dalembert comes off the books and/or settles for less, I can live with Brand on the team as long as he is an average producer and our next coach can get the most from him.

It’s easy to be pessimistic right now because we just saw the absolute worst this team can do, but I still think we have yet to see the best they can do. Only then is it fair to judge what this roster can achieve.

by jefu on May 10, 2010 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

yeah they might regain some of their lost trade value….to me the smartest thing to do is hire a coach who is going to choose a style likely to increase their values. I think the Sixers would have to play about half the game or more in sort of a small ball lineup in order to accomplish this.
Then I’d dump their asses in trades….that should have happened this past season….no vision.

by wannabgm on May 15, 2010 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think Wall will be a superstar, for sure.

by Jordan Sams on May 10, 2010 9:52 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

lebron/Howard/Kobe/Duncan/Shaq type of impact superstar?

Or are you talking the Amare/Bosh?Joe Johnson variety?

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because like I said befoer, to contend you need a uber-superstar + some good players or 3 top 20 “stars” with solid support.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

It is interesting to see the current Wade teams ofr the Kobe teams from a few years back.

They hade uber-superstars playing with garbage.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think he’ll make a few first team all-NBA teams in his day. He’s 19, has all the intangibles, and only has one weakness — his shot — which can be easily fixed. Not to mention his LeBronesque athletisism.

In short, yes he’ll be an uber-star IMO.

by Jordan Sams on May 10, 2010 10:10 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I think he has a chance to be just as good, or better than all those players you mentioned, which is why I’d be insanely happy if we won the lottery.

And our 5.4% chance is better than the 2.6% chance I had at hitting the 7 I hit on the roulette table the other night, so there’s a chance.

by Jordan Sams on May 10, 2010 10:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

My opinion is that they develop Jrue while Iguodala is still in his prime. From there they see how good Jrue can be, and when the team finally has some cap space in the coming seasons, they go for a free-agent signing for someone not named “Brand.” This is, of course, if we don’t win the lottery.

by jefu on May 10, 2010 9:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is it just Stefanksi who ignores it, or does Snider influence him?

by Jordan Sams on May 10, 2010 9:13 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

it’s all an evil conspiracy to ensure the flyers are more loved than the sixers will ever be.

by jefu on May 10, 2010 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

To be fair, there is no easy way to get a top player. You have to either stink AND get lucky, find someone willing to trade you a superstar, or clear 20mil the right year AND woo the star.

None of these things were options for Stefanski. So he chose to sign Brand and blow smoke about the merits of having a team full of solid players.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

to Stefanski’s credit, a 20/10 player seemed quite attractive at the time.

by jefu on May 10, 2010 9:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, they were in the good who will never be great category back then. But What else could he do. No superstars were available, and they were to goo to tank.

I just hate how he locked the team financially for 5 years.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

it was a gamble similar to tanking and praying you can get a superstar. How about them timberwolves?

by jefu on May 10, 2010 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

But the Wolves could very easily become the next Cavs or Magic if they get luck in the next 2-3 years. While the Sixers will have no shot at contending anytime soon if a good coach gets them 35 wins next year.

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

my point is, the NBA seems to be weighted in terms of location and trends. These factors affect the success of teams.
Losing franchises are typically desperate franchises and a desperate franchise has more difficulty achieving success.

by jefu on May 10, 2010 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yep, its unfair. Its not like the NFL were a great coach/GM can turn things around quickly regardless of the starting point.

Its all about recognizing who you are and taking the right steps to maximize you chances. But there is only som much you can do,

by tk76 on May 10, 2010 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Autographed-photo-ben-rivera-phillies1_05ba981348520854b79233eacee8eeee_small
Remember this Guy: Scott Williams
Autographed-photo-ben-rivera-phillies1_05ba981348520854b79233eacee8eeee_small
Remember this Guy: Jerald Honeycutt

Recent FanPosts

Small
Iguodala says he isn't counting on all-star spot
Small
Observations: Sixers-Spurs
Small
Sound decisions are paying off
Et_small
ESPN 25 Under 25: Young & Holiday
Small
Hollinger: What's the Sixers ceiling?
Small
Best for Sixers to avoid Heat
Small
Some love for the BUST!!!!
Small
Curmudgeon's Lawn: They Still Suck, Sometimes...
Small
Heat surge burns Sixers

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

137711075_small Jordan Sams

Sharone_wright_sixers_small Michael Levin

Associate Editor

Mo_small Tanner Steidel

Twitter_small Derek Bodner