Where Collins is screwing up the Sixers future.
I was very much in favor of bringing in Doug Collins to coach the team. He had a lot of good qualities that I thought would work well with the young, athletic Sixers. He understands the game and offensive and defensive theory. He's really a decent X and O coach. He has a concept of what it takes to win ball games and how to assemble a team.
My problem is that he's not a good strategic thinker. He doesn't seem to be able to identify and exploit weaknesses on the other team. He doesn't work to create match-ups that favor his players or seem concerned with floor balance, between rebounders/inside players and outside players. I think it is a strength of the Sixers that they have a number of different style players and that they can find favorable match-ups most night that take advantage of their superior athleticism.
Right now there is a disagreement over whether to take a dive this season in order to get a better draft pick, or try to see if the team is capable of making the playoffs even if it would be a quick out. To my way of thinking, the draft pick is better, simply because I assume the team is incapable of making a deep playoff run as they are now.
All this brings me to how the team should be coached now: It is a bad thing to assume that your team can't compete without exhausting all possibilities. We have seen this with the Sixers over the course of the season. Thad Young and Jodi Meeks were bench players- deep on the bench. Spencer Hawes was getting 20 min. a night of less. Jason Kapono was starting. This wasn't working so Doug started searching for something else. He finally figured out that Young was a better choice than Kapono, Nocioni, or Turner. He figured out that Jodi Meeks was a better outside shot and could spread the floor. (A very important piece)
With all these improvements I now think the team is closer to it's potential, and there's really only one stone left to turn over: Mareese Speights. I have said this since the beginning and everyone's response is that Speights sucks. I say maybe he does, and maybe he doesn't. I'm not the only one who seems to think he has real potential. All of this is irrelevant! What is relevant is that the Sixers are deficient when it comes to rebounding and inside scoring, and that the only player left on the roster who could make a difference is Speights.
If we do anything else this season, we have to determine if he can play and contribute or not! If he makes the team worse, that is good for Mission B.J. and if he makes the team better, it changes my view on whether we can really compete or not. In either case this is a no-brainer: You have to play him to know what you have. At worst you get the better draft pick and know to get rid of him. At best you find yourself in legitimate playoff contention. Both are better than where we are now. In between, we also create a FA market for Speights and get some value for him in a trade.
Another user-created commentary provided by a Liberty Ballers reader.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Unfortunately Speights is NOT an inside scorer. I think the times have been far and few between when the guy actually establishes position. Give it up, he’s a scrub energy big ALA Chris Wilcox. We know what he has because he plays so poorly it’s a freaking eyesore.
Same with Turner. It’s an eyesore just mentioning his name.
I’m with ya LeQuan. Frankly, I don’t know what most of the people that blog on this site see when they watch the games. I posted a month ago about Evan Turner and how lost he looked. Now, he doesn’t even play, yet everyone still thinks he’s going to be a great NBA player. Speights is a waste of space. Would rather still have Reggie Evans(before injury). Brand has been solid all year. Offensively, the team looks good right now, but defensively we got a long way to go. Opposing teams penetrate way too much, and when they do we have no intimidation. I’m just glad someone else knows what they’re watching!
Sixers are 19th in the NBA in points scored, 18th in field goal percentage, 9th in points allowed, and 4th in opponents field goal percentage . I question which team you’re watching.
Don’t have the energy to argue with stat geeks. The Celtics shooting a layup to win the game and the Lakers scoring 35 in the 4th doesn’t seem like good defense to me. Their losses have been due to breakdowns defensively, not a lack of offense.
Points scored, points allowed, and field goal percentages are pretty basic.
If the Sixers had such a good offense then giving up 35 points in a quarter wouldn’t have been a problem. They lost by 12. 24 points would have done it. They held a team that is averaging more than 106 points per game to 93 and still lost. The failure in the 4th quarter was on both ends of the court. If you’re going to kill the defense for one bad quarter then how can you say that the offense looks good when they played 4 mediocre-to-bad quarters in the same game?
hahahahahahaha
Liberty Ballers / Ridiculous Upside / SBN Philly / Twitter
The Artist Formerly Known As The Artist Formerly Known As Michael Bourn
by Michael Levin on Dec 22, 2010 2:39 PM PST up reply actions
Speights has been known for his laziness and lack of defense. Turner, by all accounts so far, has been working hard and acting like a professional. How about we give the guy a chance to get better before we start lumping him in with the Mareese Speights of the world.
In terms of MissionBJ, I believe you should always do your best to win. We could easily be a .500 team so far this year if not for a few late collapses, but the team has played significantly better the past couple of weeks or so. MissionBJ is a loser’s mentality.

by 














