Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: All Hail David Luiz

Sixers Training Camp: Thaddeus Young at Small Forward; Holiday/Turner not clicking

Sixers training camp wrapped up this weekend and tomorrow we'll finally get to see them in action vs. the Nets. The big news of the weekend was Doug Collins saying that he would not use Thaddeus Young at power forward this season, only small forward. Whether he keeps his word or not remains to be seen, but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt, for now. Playing Thaddeus at small forward has a few implications.

It will help the defensive rebounding when he's on the floor. We all know Sam Dalembert was a top 3 defensive rebounder last year, and losing him will hurt the Sixers tremendously. In order to hold their own on the boards they're going to have to piece together lineups where each player is a decent defensive rebounder at his position, and rebound by committee. Obviously that's not ideal, but it's the hand we were dealt after the trade. Playing Thaddeus Young at the four would do nothing but magnify the weakness. His career DREB% is 12.4, which would've ranked him 106 overall among 6'8'' or taller players who played at least 1,000 minutes last season. Pairing him with average rebounders like Speights and Hawes in the frontcourt may have made the Sixers the worst defensive rebounding team in the league. 

It also creates a massive logjam at three positions. Jrue Holdiay, Lou Williams, Andre Iguodala, Evan Turner, Jodie Meeks, Thaddeus Young, Andres Nocioni and Jason Kapono are going to have to split 144 minutes. Holiday and Iguodala alone warrant 75 minutes, which leaves 69 minutes for 6 players. If I had to guess I'd say Meeks is the odd man out and Nocioni gets a few minutes at power forward. Unlike Thad, he's a decent enough rebounder to get away with playing the four. Even then you're left with 60-65 minutes for Lou, Turner, Thaddeus and Kapono. Trying to predict how it's going to play out makes my head hurt, so we'll take the wait and see approach. Point is, someone may be unhappy with their playing time. 

All things considered, I like the idea. I've always thought Thaddeus was better off at the three and the move all but eliminates his biggest weakness. Although awful for a power forward, his rebounding is adequate for small forward. And from what I've read it sounds like Collins isn't asking Thaddeus to do anything on offense that is beyond his skillset i.e. creating off the dribble. That's what coaching is all about, putting your players in position to succeed.

Make the jump for the links.

Star-divide

Fagan on Chris Quinn and the aforementioned Thaddeus news: Deep Sixer

"Absolutely," said Collins when asked if Quinn had a chance to make the roster. "We have the option of keeping a 15th guy. Before we made the trade to get Songaila and Brackins, we were looking at a possible 15th guy being a young big guy we can develop. So now we're looking at our roster and we lose Willie and we're looking at a third point guard. If CG continues to do what he does, now you go and you fight and say, ‘Look, we need to keep this guy,' ... You have to have some insurance at that third backup position."

"I'm not going to do that right now because I want [Thaddeus] to think as a three," Collins explained. "I told our big guys, 'I do not want to have to go to a small lineup right now so you have to rebound and defend your position so you don't make me want to tinker around and do that.'"

Fagan provides scrimmage analysis: Deep Sixer

The anti-Princeton ...

A general observation about the offense: it's simple and allows the players to make their own reads. At no point during the scrimmage did you see a guy out past the three-point line, stuck, unable to initiate the offense. There were a few occasions when a team had to settle for a bad shot (I remember Hawes having to take a long three), but for the most part each team was creating things offensively, which is good for a team with so many creative offensive players.

Holiday/Turner not clicking ...

Back to the aforementioned backcourt of Holiday/Turner. In theory, this combo is exciting. But so far, it's just not happening out there on the court ... Set after set, we watched Holiday run the point and watched Turner try to get himself open off the cluster screen. He wasn't getting open. And when you consider that waiting for a fruitless cut turns the play clock from 18 seconds (we have time for anything) to 12 seconds (we better get going), it becomes an issue.

On Hawes ...

It was in transition and it was just Turner and Hawes. And Hawes just absolutely tomahawk slammed the ball on Turner. Turner kind of turned and shrugged like, ‘Wow, what can you do?' Hawes let out a roar. But for the remainder of the scrimmage, Hawes was relatively absent.

On Meeks ...

Meeks shot the ball well. He made two long three pointers. He's looking more and more like a guy who has to play at least a few minutes every game. He plays aggressively on defense, too, and seems to be able to stay in front of whomever he's guarding.

On Brackins ... 

The jury is still out on what Brackins' impact might be this season. He can definitely spread defenses with his shooting touch, but he just doesn't play like he's 6-foot-10. He plays like he's 6-foot-6.

Cooney wonders where Turner's minutes will come from ...

So where does that leave Turner? Andre Iguodala is the starting "two" guard right now. Lou Williams will come off the bench and fill that spot for a good amount of minutes, probably moving Iguodala to the "three." Collins has said that Holiday will play "36 minutes for 82 games." That doesn't appear to leave a ton of minutes for Turner.

Speights talks more defense: Philly.com

"Defense is all mental, so I'm good. I'm going to work every day to get better on defense and help the team out."

Fagan breaks down Collins' offense: Deep Sixer

One of the most crucial components of the team's new offensive sets is the "cluster," which appears to be a three-man game away from the ball. Collins has been heard evoking the name of his former pupil, Michael Jordan, who ran the play to the tune of something like 25,000 points. With the Sixers, it's a three-man read between - using the starters as an example - Iguodala, Young, and Brand. Brand runs interference while Iguodala and Young make cuts off of him.

Training Camp Videos: Sixers.com

Up Next: Sixers open their pre-season tomorrow night against the Nets.

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I like to remain positive on Turner, but how has Cousins and Favors looked lately?

by Ant on Oct 4, 2010 10:39 AM PDT reply actions  

Favors tore it up in the Nets first pre-season game. Not sure on Cousins. Check out Nets Daily and Sactown Royalty if you’re really that interested.

Hindsight is always 20/20. I’m waiting till at least the end of the season to jump on the ‘they should’ve taken Favors or Cousins’ bandwagon. I was about 60/40 on Turner/Favors, but given a choice between Turner and Cousins before the draft I would’ve taken Turner 100% of the time. Can’t knock the front office for a decision I would’ve made myself.

by Jordan Sams on Oct 4, 2010 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

It should be said that Favors dominated against an Israeli squad that had nobody that could deal with his size at all. Speights could have killed this team too.

by yosoysean on Oct 4, 2010 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Right. Let’s see how they do against NBA players before making any judgment.

by RickoT on Oct 4, 2010 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

When it comes to this offense, with this roster, “cluster” is only half a word.

Seriously, I hope there is at least one more significant trade before the season starts. Someone has to want a couple of small forwards for a center. Please? :)

I wanted them to draft Turner, and I stand behind what I wanted.(However, I was always on record as being very much against the Sam trade). This is an oddly constructed team, where really only one player has a definite position in the entire rotation (Jrue at PG). Everyone else, including Iguodala, is being put in a “let’s just stick him somewhere and see how it goes” situation. Then we make excuses for them, and for the system (although, at least there is one this year), when the fact is, the roster as currently assembled makes exactly zero sense.

Is there any way they can trade Kapono and Nocioni for a mediocre tall guy who can rebound? Or some combination of Kapono, Nocioni, Songaila, Thad Young, and Lou Williams for a tall guy who can actually play, as well? How many of those five players do they need? One? Keep either Lou or Thad and trade the rest for a serviceable PF or C. Yes, I know, wishful thinking. But hey, a guy’s gotta dream, no?

They have a third PG. His name is Evan Turner. They need big guys. Hopefully, better big guys than Trent Plaisted. Or Spencer Hawes, for that matter. Where is Rod Benson when you need him?

Maybe their next revolving-door coach will be Don Nelson, who would just love this roster (except for the lack of three-point shooting).

by dweebowitz on Oct 4, 2010 12:40 PM PDT reply actions  

Dweeb: The problem is that there aren’t that many young bigs to be had, or impact bigs period. That’s the theory behind this roster: That the game has changed(I fundamentally disagree with Doug Collins). Secondly, even if there were, would our pieces be enough to acquire them? I like Thad and I like Lou, but 1: Thad’s expiring, teams may be reluctant and 2: A guy of Lou’s caliber can be found at the very least every other draft.

There’s ONE player on this team that could net a guy we want: Iguodala. Iguodala has the market value to get a good caliber big.

by LeQuan Glover on Oct 4, 2010 12:47 PM PDT reply actions  

I’m not talking about a top-level big, which is what I would expect for Iguodala. I’m talking about someone at least 6’9 that can rebound and play defense. That shouldn’t require parting with Iguodala. And Kapono and Songaila are significant (although admittedly not huge) expiring contracts, so they might have some trade value in a package with a Thad or Lou to get an average big. Which the Sixers do not currently have on their roster, unless Brand has a lot more in the tank than I think he does, or Speights gets a sudden brain and backbone transplant and develops both the ability to play defense and some basketball IQ.

It makes me sad. I really wanted Speights to be good. He has so much potential, and his 5-cent head is going to ruin it all…

by dweebowitz on Oct 5, 2010 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yup. Probably the best realistic outcome too. I would rather be in the lottery than KOed in the first round again.

by philiafan14364 on Oct 4, 2010 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hey Thad, “Don’t Go Chasing Waterfalls.”
.
.
.

by tk76 on Oct 4, 2010 2:34 PM PDT reply actions  

Right now, Thad should be a 3. He’s too slight to be a PF, can you imagine him guarding Garnett or Duncan?

Eventually his body may fill out and he’ll be strong enough to play a 4.

But the best teams have relatively big men at the 3. LA has Odom and Boston has Pierce. Who on the Sixers would you rather have guarding these players? I will say that Thad is faster than either of those players and would cause problems for them when trying to defend him.

The back-court is heavy with talent and players, and Collins does want the most talented group on the floor, but cannot ignore height in the process.

Life would have been much easier if we didn’t draft Turner. I told you all that drafting him would cause problems, even if he is a good player. No one can argue that Favors or Cousins would have been a better fit. We need rebounding power players, the more the better.

by RickoT on Oct 4, 2010 3:17 PM PDT reply actions  

I think Thad’s great at the three. People make too big a deal out of Thad’s “turnovers”. His turnover rate is equal to Iguodala. Most of Thad’s problems come when he tries to make a fancy move or when he’s in the open court. When he’s playing within the game, he’s so smooth and quick and he attacks the basket with intensity.

by LeQuan Glover on Oct 4, 2010 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

High turnovers from a guy that’s supposed to make plays for your offense isn’t that bad of a thing. The elite PGs all have high TO rates. Wade and LeBron have high TO rates. When you’re making plays you’re going to turn the ball over.

High turnovers from a guy who is only asked to score the ball is pretty bad.

by yosoysean on Oct 4, 2010 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

I feel like its water under the bridge at this point… why stress myself out complaining.

I was a fan of trade turner and get Cousins at 4 (the big) and Paul George (or Luke Babbitt) type from Minny (or even a Martell Webster) – someone who could play the wing and shoot a 3.

That still appears to be the hole- that being said, I still think its too early to judge what did go down and Im cheering for them all to mesh and do well – then we have extra assets people will want in tare for our beloved, Moses-Malone-like big man.

fwiw – I am glad to see sammy go, I know it leaves a hole. But between him and Bill Green – I couldnt take watching (or listening to) them anymore…

by shova on Oct 5, 2010 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

tare = trade (oops)

by shova on Oct 5, 2010 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools


Editor

Morris_small Jordan Sams

Sharone_wright_sixers_small Michael Levin

Associate Editor

Lourdre2_small Tanner Steidel

Twitter_small Derek Bodner

Contributor

Autographed-photo-ben-rivera-phillies1_05ba981348520854b79233eacee8eeee_small Dave Rueter