Liberty Ballers: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cottagers Confidential for Fulham FC Fans!

Who is Jason Kapono?

At the time of the Jason Kapono for Reggie Evans trade -- we as Sixers fans -- had mixed emotions. I had no idea why. I was ecstatic. Ed Stefanski had just traded one of our most expendable players for the best (percentage wise) three-point shooter in NBA history. Why weren't some as giddy as I was? Well, whispers about Kapono being the worst perimeter defender in the league and turnover-prone, one-dimensional player had them worried. Then I started to worry. So what did I do? I surfed the web to gauge the reaction from Raptors Nation, and what did I discover? They were just as happy as I was. Hmmm.

A few hours passed and my enthusiasm dampened. I went from calling my friend Alex to tell him that Ed Stefanski had just made the greatest trade of all-time, and I'll see his Lakers in the Championship next year, to... "ehh, on second thought, this trade was good -- but very minor."

Two days later, I received an e-mail from my boy Adam from Raptors HQ, and some of my enthusiasm has returned. Take a look.

So here's the deal on Kapono.

When he was signed as the Raptors big-free agent a few summers ago, it was viewed as a bit of a coup. Toronto of course had had issues with signing free-agents of much significance in the Rob Babcock era and after a promising start under Bryan Colangelo, I think many thought this was another step towards Eastern Conference crown.

At the HQ though, we weren't fans. The team needed upgrades in rebounding, athletic ability, and toughness, not to mention a player who could create his own shot from the wing. Kapono obviously represented none of these things, and even as an exceptional shooter, I strongly felt that we were over-paying for a one-dimensional player.

I asked Bryan Colangelo about this at the Raptors' Media Day that fall and his answer was very curious. He argued that with the likes of Parker, Calderon, Bargnani and now Kapono, this deadly outside shooting would result in more successful makes from the field and therefore less rebounds to grab. This left many of the media including myself scratching our collective heads, and sure enough, as the season bore on, it was obvious that Kap-One was not the answer.

There is no denying how great a shooter Kapono is, perhaps one of the greatest of all time in terms of pure form and the speed at which he could get a shot off. However for such a potent long-range threat, he just didn't shoot 3's often enough. For instance, even though Kapono was brought in to fire-away from long-range, in his first season with the Raps, he attempted only 1.5 three-pointers per game. To put that in perspective, the lowest number of 3's attempted by former Sixer Kyle Korver was 2.8 in his rookie season...when he was playing only about 12 minutes a game!

At first the blame for this was laid at the feet of Sam Mitchell, especially after the team looked to get JK more involved against Orlando in the 2008 playoffs and he came out guns blazing. However even under Jay Triano last season, and with repeated attempts to run plays specifically for the UCLA alum, Kapono just couldn't get it going consistently. He shot only 43 per cent from the field and from 3-point range, his lowest totals in years.

The bigger problem with Kapono's lack of scoring is that without it, he can be a huge liability. He's prone to fouls (it was essentially a guarantee that he'd foul his man within seconds of checking into a game), a terrible individual defender, and barely a presence on the glass. And in the current NBA, playing Kapono at the 2-3 meant he was usually matched up defensively against the best players in the league, ones who wouldn't hesitate to take advantage of his poor lateral quicks and lack of athleticism.

That being said, it's not all bad and I really think Kapono can be a valuable asset...in the right system. In Miami paired with Shaq and Wade, opponents were busy trying to either double Shaq, or being drawn to the rim thanks to Wade's forays into the paint, so Kapono had lots of room to operate on the perimeter, and plenty of opportunities to get his shot up. Toronto on the other hand hasn't had anyone who can create off the bounce since Vince Carter went south and Bosh isn't the back-to-the-basket threat that Shaq is. As well, Colangelo's attempt at a twin towers combo of Bosh and O'Neal in order to create room for his array of perimeter gunners fell flat. Therefore in Philly, if Brand can stay healthy and re-establish himself as a force down low, and Iguodala keeps attacking the tin, then suddenly Kapono becomes a much more lethal option. He'll still be a liability on D, but one thing Kapono doesn't get enough credit for is his basketball IQ and passing abilities. Both of these should be an asset to the 76ers, especially in Princeton-esque offence that Eddie Jordan will likely run, and I can see Kap-One killing the Raptors a few times this coming season by finishing fast-breaks with long-range bombs.

Here's what I took away from Adam's analysis:

  • Tis true, Jason is a bad defender.
  • Tis also true, Jason is one of the best pure shooters in the league -- if not the best.
  • One of Kapono's biggest criticisms is, he doesn't shoot enough. How often is an NBA player criticized for not shooting enough? This is encouraging news because it can be fixed. This isn't a physical or fundamental flaw. This is a coaching flaw. I sftrongy believe (as does Adam), if Kapono is in the right system, with the right coach, he can be a great pick-up for the Sixers.
  • Jason will get open shots. Remember how many times Donny-Ice found himself wide open when he was in the game? The same should happen with Kapono. Andre Iguodala is a great drive-and-kick guy, and Elton is an an above average passer out of the post.
Now I have a better idea who Jason Kapono is and how he will contribute to the the 2009-2010 Sixers -- and I'm still a HUGE fan of the trade. Bravo Eddy Stefanski, bravo.

Note: Huge thanks to Adam for providing commentary on Kapono. Who knows the players better than their fans? I'm in the process of giving him my commentary on Reggie Evans. Feel free to give your "Reg-gie" commentary in the comments. I'm sure Adam and other Raps fans will be reading.

0 recs  |  Comment 35 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

trade shooting for hustle/rebounding

“minor” deals, but both address needs for each team, so good deal, IMO.

if the raptors are still in need of a physical guy who will rebound and hustle, then allow me to introduce you to your new fan favorite. he brings a great attitude and effort to every game. while his offensive skills are questionable, he’ll often grab his own miss and head to the line (where he improved nicely after he stopped fading away every time).

with the logjam at F, reggie wasn’t playing anyway, so to trade a position of surplus for a position in need (and the best statistical shooter in history, to boot!) is a great deal, even if it’s not a “major move.”

http://poorsportsblog.blogspot.com/

by PoorSports on Jun 11, 2009 1:42 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Except of course – reggie evans didn’t actually help the sixers rebound better except when he wasn’t on the floor – thank god he’s gone so the fallacy of ‘good rebounder’ can move on to Toronto as well.

Kapono has the ‘best’ 3 point range career (by percentage) – he’s not the best statistical shooter in history – but he’s also been trending downward since he left Miami – he’s worse defensively than korver – and he’s not good at ‘off the dribble’ – think korver earlier in his career before he got better – except Kapono has been in the league a while now and hasn’t learned to create off the dribble.

He’s a nice piece, a small piece, but the sixers still have a long way to go

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 6:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, best shooter from outside. shoulda clarified.

but reggie is a great rebounder. top-10 in the NBA in rebounds per 48 minutes for the last six seasons, leading the league in 2006-07 at 19.7. he finished seventh in the NBA last season with an average of 15.3. he just didn’t get the minutes (because of depth, foul trouble, etc) to show it off. you can’t argue with those stats.

http://poorsportsblog.blogspot.com/

by PoorSports on Jun 12, 2009 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh this argument again

AS A TEAM (cause it’s a team sport right) – the sixers were worse in all aspects of basketball (except maybe offnsive rebounding) when reggie was on the floor – i really don’t give a crap what his per 48 minute numbers were – he was a negative on the floor.

Effort doesn’t equal talent

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

no one said he was talented

i just said “reggie evans hustles and rebounds” and if that’s what the raptors wanted out of a player, they got him.

just like we wanted more 3 point shooting on our team, and we got it. no one said we traded a “really talented forward” for a “game-changing deep threat.” if anything, i said this was a MINOR move in the right direction, addressing needs for both teams.

you turned it into a “reggie evans has no talent” post, when it never was about that. and having “effort” is certainly an accomplishment. imagine what some NBA players could do with reggie’s effort. you can’t teach hustle, and toronto now has that on their team. when so few NBA players look like they try (especially on defense) then YES, effort IS an accomplishment.

http://poorsportsblog.blogspot.com/

by PoorSports on Jun 12, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ANd I pointed out that the sixers were a worse rebounding team when reggie is on the floor so i’m not sure how he ‘helps’ a team rebounding?

Ugh, so now you can’t teach hustle? It’s like you can’t teach height.

Two maxims that allow for lesser talented players to have longer careers than they should because some of the folks (and fans) of the NBA still have their heads in the sand about reality

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you ever play basketball?

hustle counts for a lot. it IS what allows “lesser talented players” to succeed: BECAUSE THEY TRY! you think the most successful people at their jobs are that way because of talent? many of them are there because of effort. all the talent in the world means nothing if you don’t try. reggie may not be the most talented basketball player, but his effort is a more rare quality than a good jump shot.

but i think the real point of this all is that no one said reggie is/was an all-star or that he was a crucial part of this team, we’re just saying that toronto said they wanted a physical presence to defend and rebound, both of which reggie is known/touted/recognized for.

P.S. according to your site, the 76ers drew more fouls with him on the floor and rebounded better (51.4 ON court, 51.0 OFF court). so he certainly helped them in some ways.

http://poorsportsblog.blogspot.com/

by PoorSports on Jun 12, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hustle and trying matters when you’re 15 in gym class…

As for reggies impact on rebounding – look more closely – it’s all offensive rebounding which to me is a lot less important than defensive rebounding if eh’s the ‘defensive specialist’ everyone wants him to be why are the sixers so bad at defensive rebounds when he’s on the floor – oh yeah – cause he’s not good.

The point is that there are people who think reggie is a positive asset, a useful player who helps a team win whereas the facts and the available information counteract that but no one wants to believe it.

The blue collar mentality of philadelphia drives me nuts – one cause it elevates players who aren’t very good beyond where they should be considered – denegreates great players for similar reasons – nd of course PHILADELPHIA IS NOT A BLUE COLLAR CITY

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha. gym class. that takes me back. nah, hustle matters all the time. i dont know how anyone who claims to be as in tune with sports as you seem to be can’t see that effort/hustle/trying matters all the time. in everything. say you can measure players ability tangibly. like lebron james’ ability is 99 out of 100. so if he tries at 100%, he can be a 99. but if he only gives it half an effort every night (not saying lebron does, just using his name as an example), he’s only a 44.5.

reggie’s ability is like a 65. but when he gives 100 percent effort and plays to his full potential ability, he’s giving you more than a “more talented player” because of effort and effort alone.

so we throw out offensive rebounds because it’s “not as important to you as defensive rebounding”? ok, that makes sense. also, playing good defense is not always about getting the defensive rebound. you can play great on the ball D, but if the shot is missed and SOME OTHER player lets his man grab the offensive rebound, how is that the guy defending the shooter’s fault?

you must not live in or around philly if you dont think this town is blue collar. and if you do live around here, you must be sheltered/pampered. that’s been the attitude of the city forever. based on that statement, along wtih your take on reggie, you clearly live in a different world than the rest of us.

http://poorsportsblog.blogspot.com/

by PoorSports on Jun 12, 2009 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hah, nice math by me

half of 99 is 49.5, not 44.5.

maybe i should take more statistics classes. hah

http://poorsportsblog.blogspot.com/

by PoorSports on Jun 12, 2009 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like when Adam said this...
He’ll still be a liability on D, but one thing Kapono doesn’t get enough credit for is his basketball IQ and passing abilities. Both of these should be an asset to the 76ers, especially in Princeton-esque offence that Eddie Jordan will likely run, and I can see Kap-One killing the Raptors a few times this coming season by finishing fast-breaks with long-range bombs.

by jsams on Jun 12, 2009 7:00 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

He really just sounds like Kyle Korver to me :)

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 7:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm good with that.

I liked what Korver brought to the team, even in his early years.

by jsams on Jun 12, 2009 7:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

On Reggie

Say what you want about his basketball skills… they’re not great. But his effort is nearly unparalleled… he gives it everything he’s got every single time he steps on the court. He’s top 2% in the entire league (anecdotally, of course) in terms of work ethic. It’s almost guaranteed he’ll out work the guy he’s guarding.

I’ll miss his energy… a lot. Not his shooting, but his energy. ;)

by BSM PSU 93 on Jun 12, 2009 7:21 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Jesus – a chicken without a head hustles a lot too – but it doesn’t accomplish anything, and yet again, reggies over all impact on the court is negative…he runs around a lot cause he doesn’t usually have a clue what he’s supposed to be doing – he wastes whatever energy he has – and he doens’t help team rebounding…

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 7:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

where are you getting that his impact is negative?

you talking about the net points scored (+/-) when he’s on the floor? because he’s often out there with the second team, so he can’t shoulder all the blame if that’s the case.

on an individual basis, he does more to help a team than hurt them 90% of the time. what’s with the hate for reggie?

http://poorsportsblog.blogspot.com/

by PoorSports on Jun 12, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just won 5 bucks...

I bet my roommate that good ol’ jemagee would respond negatively to my comment by the end of the day. Look at that… it didn’t even take 12 minutes! LOL

jemagee hates Reggie Evans… HATES him! You’d think Reggie kicked his dog or stole his girlfriend, though the latter obviously isn’t possible.

Like you, PoorSports, I thought my comments were MORE than reasonable and highly accurate. The guy works his ass off on the court. How can anyone POSSIBLY say that’s untrue? He’s not a starter, nor a great offensive weapon, but he makes up for many of his deficiencies with hard work and effort. To berate him to the extent that jemagee does is simply wrong.

by BSM PSU 93 on Jun 12, 2009 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love people who equate ‘effort’ with accomplishment…they don’t equate folks – if a guy is bad he’s bad regardless of how much he ‘hustles’.

I can’t expect someone who went to PSU to be capable of higher thought – i understand it – but reggie evans is a negative impact TO THE TEAM when he’s on the floor – there a lot of ways to describe it – and others do it better.

Of course if you fall in the john marzano – i watch the games so i can tell without having to actually find facts to support it – school of thought – that again – well that’s what a penn state education gets you.

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

PS – glad I could help you win 5 bucks
Sorry you’re life is so sad that you have time to do things like that
Sorry that you’re ignorance leads me to have to educate you on facts and opposed to opinions – they are different things – there is very little real evidence that supports that reggie evans is positive on a basketball court – but the antiquated uneducated thinking that ‘effort = accomplishment’ is always good for a laugh

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

www.82games.com – explore it.

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

as someone who has taken a few statistics classes in my day

these kinds of things never tell the whole story.

with reggie on the court as opposed to on the bench, opponents would outscore the 76ers by 1.3 points every 100 possessions. that’s one FT for every 100 possessions.

speights by comparison (who was up and down but i think we’d all agree is “better” than reggie) would allow the 76ers to be outscored by 4.3 more points every 100 possessions (over 3x as many as reggie).

while speights is certainly younger and has great upside, i wouldn’t have bet on him being “worse” than reggie based on your stats, but he is. the fact of the matter is that you can prove/disprove nearly anything with statistics. basketball is a team game, and to isolate one player (based on what the TEAM did with him on the floor) is not telling of his impact, but only the impact WHEN HE WAS ON THE FLOOR, not what he actually was doing.

for that, you’d have to watch the games with a “john marzano” mindset and actually pay attention to what he does when he plays, not what a statistician grinded out after the fact. reggie hustles, plays good defense and rebounds. whether his squad did well with him out there or not is not the issue. the issue is – is reggie evans a positive on the floor and that answer is yes (if you need rebounding and defense).

http://poorsportsblog.blogspot.com/

by PoorSports on Jun 12, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Speights is horrible defensively – i’m not arguing that.

The point is that every talks about reggies ‘hustle’ and ‘rebounding’ – and he doesn’t really help when he’s on the floor – it’s smoke and mirrors.

Again – the eye lies – and you think that reggie ‘rebounds’ and are looking at counting stats – it’s not about counting stats – it’s about percentage of available rebounds that the sixers get – and when reggie is on the floor – the sixers get LESS available rebounds than when he’s on the floor – they score less points – they give up more points.

I’ve taken a few statistics class as well – and what I see constantly is people who dismiss stats out of hand (especially when it disproves their point) and think it’s one or the other (watching or stats) when really it’s both – i watch reggie do stupid things all the time – i watch reggie rebound his own misses and then miss agian, and then rebound again and then miss agian – from 2 feet – he’s worse from 2 feet than possibly any other player in the aba – it’s bad enough that dalembert makes the sixers offense 5 on 4 – when evans is in there it’s a giant disaster.

Reggie Evans is the basketball equivalent of sound and fury signifying nothing in my opinion.

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

then you saw him get fouled on so many offensive rebounds, right?

his effort draws extra fouls on the other teams while simply fighting him for a rebound, which then could translate into less PT for that player or he has to be more careful playing d later on in the game (none of which can be measured with stats). we also never talk about his impact on the team’s mentality overall. when one guy is diving for balls and hustling, it’s contagious. “energy guys” help the team in other ways by leading by example. in practice, reggie plays just as hard as in games to help his team get better every day. that’s a valuable asset, not “sound and fury signifying nothing”

but i’m done with this now. our arguments only seem to validate the idea that reggie is some hugely valuable player, when all i set out to say is that if toronto wanted a player who will be physical, hustle and rebound, they got their man.

http://poorsportsblog.blogspot.com/

by PoorSports on Jun 12, 2009 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

PS – for anyone who wants to learn a bit more besides looking at his ‘rebounds per 48 minutes’

http://www.82games.com/0809/0809PHI.HTM

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 9:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Jeamagee

seems like an individual we have in the raptors republic named khandor…completely predictably idiotic….anywho…not trying to rub it in, but as a die hard raps fan, i am ecstatic about this trade; i would have been glad to take back some water bottles and used sweat towels for K-Fraud’s contract and lack of d’…..good luck with him and we’ll take some ball grabbin’ hustle any day of the week

by MC B rad on Jun 12, 2009 11:22 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yup – you know me – being silly and using things like facts and evidence to disprove fallacies and mis statements…silly

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hate to break it to you

but reggie makes almost as much as kapono and we were saying HIS contract was a bit much. but as long as both teams are over paying for a player addressing an area of need, i dont think either side is complaining.

no one wants to overpay someone they can’t/aren’t using, but to overpay someone who at least plays and fills a need is OK in my book. i’d rather see you try to address the problem than to let the current situation play out without a shooter (or D/rebounding in toronto’s case).

http://poorsportsblog.blogspot.com/

by PoorSports on Jun 12, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

actually kapono makes about a millon dollars more than reggie – so the ‘salary swing’ decreased the sixers ‘luxury tax buffer’ if the luxury tax is a real ceiling about 12% of projected luxury tax number.

It just means that if the luxury tax is a ‘hard’ ceiling for the sixers, obtaining kapono decreased available funds to obtain other players.

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i was talking to the toronto fan

saying that getting rid of kapono’s “bad contract” was what a lot of people were saying we should do with reggie over the past season because of his “bad contract”. basically saying that we essentially swapped a rebounding role player for a 3 point shooting one without adjusting the contracts much.

http://poorsportsblog.blogspot.com/

by PoorSports on Jun 12, 2009 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Loved this post

I thought Kapono was solid on the Heat (half my family lives in Miami) but wondered why he couldnt fit into Toronto other than just his redundancy with Parker etc.

And yeah Reggie has next to no talent, but he manages to stay in the NBA and be a millionaire because he works hard. He could easily be a nobody over in Europe. If some lottery busts worked as hard as he does a few of them could easily be great players. Someone like Kwame Brown for example.

by jmorcate on Jun 12, 2009 11:28 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That’s not really true. Kwame Brown never had the skills necessary to be a #1 pick. He’s got bad hands, no touch and a “basketball IQ” that makes Sam Dalembert look like Bill Russell. He was doomed from the get-go by being drafted that high. Doomed in the sense that he’s labeled a bust and made fun of on the internet, that is. Cause, you know, he’s still made more money than most of us will see in a whole lifetime.

by zfg on Jun 12, 2009 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reggie Evans stays in the league and makes a lot of money cause the NBA has guaranteed contracts and someone gave him the extension.

The NBA is littered with bad contracts, players who shouldn’t have contracts, just cause they have a contract doesn’t mean they belong in the NBA any more than winning american idol means you can sing.

A lot of people are very poor at judging talent – and in the NBA – you are in a closed system mostly – with recycling and the same people getting the same jobs – after repeated failures – over and over

I mean seriously – look at who got the kings head coaching job

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 11:51 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

winning american idol DOES mean you can sing

real, professional music producers (simon cowell, randy jackson, that saucy new chick) picked them out.

reggie could and would beat 99% of the world’s population in basketball. there are TONS of players for teams to look at (with europe, NBDL, college, etc) that if reggie wasn’t considered a consensus NBA talent, no one would have wanted him.

i didn’t know your scouting and eye for talent was better than the ENTIRE NBA! i hope you run out of haterade sometime soon.

http://poorsportsblog.blogspot.com/

by PoorSports on Jun 12, 2009 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No – the american public votes on who wins american idol – they pick the winners

and the american public – as a whole – is as clueless about talent (and most things, just look at elections) as cavemen would be about the internet.

reggie could and would beat 99% of the world’s population in basketball. t depends – if shooting was involved who know s- he’d probably lose as he sucks – even from 2 feet in .

Second – GUARANTEED CONTRACTS – no there aren’t a lot of other optpoins than reggie – someone has to pay reggie 5 million dollars to play basketball next year…

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Jun 12, 2009 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the american public votes on who wins. those judges (who certainly DO know talent) HAND PICK who is considered for the contest. they don’t allow people who can’t sing to even make the first cut. so of all the people who are able to be voted on by the american public, they have already been “pro-approved” by the judges. the basketball equivialent would be having nba scouts set rosters, but the american public voting on the starting 5 or who gets to take the final shot.

i dont think you understand just how hard it is to make it into the NBA and how talented ALL those players are. he would DESTROY 99% of the american public in basketball on sheer size (and effort) alone.

allen houston. chris webber. aaron mckie last year. todd mccullough (ok, more medical, but i think you see my point here). these were all players who no NBA team wanted but still were getting money out of their guaranteed contracts. teams eat money if the player cant play. if reggie couldn’t play, why would toronto go get him? mark madsen hustles, too. they could have gotten him if they wanted, but they CHOSE reggie.

you really think toronto is that bad of an organization that they’d take a player who has no value to their team, simply because he has a guaranteed contract? someone has to pay him next year, but if he’s so bad, why would toronto want to pay him? why not leave him here? because he’s not that bad, that’s why.

http://poorsportsblog.blogspot.com/

by PoorSports on Jun 12, 2009 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Liberty Ballers, the SB Nation blog for the Philadelphia 76ers.
Start posting about the 76ers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Small
LibertyBallers March Madness Trash-Talk page
Small
Not tanking
Profile_small
SixersBeat Radio Show
Ty2_small
Tankapalooza '10:
Small
Eskin: per 76ers Jordan will not coach next year!!!
Small
Holiday Bursts Through Infamous Rookie Wall?
Djackson-1280x800-players_small
Iverson's Wife Files for Divorce
Nomoreej_small
The upcoming week in the lottery (3/1-3/7)
Nowitzness
Who you got?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Straight Cash Homie

Liberty Ballers

SBNation.com Recent Stories

San Antonio Spurs guard Malik Hairston is fouled on a dunk attempt over the Golden State Warriors' Anthony Tolliver during the second half of an NBA basketball game at the AT&T Center in San Antonio, Friday, March 19, 2010. The Spurs beat the Warriors, 147-116. (AP Photo/Bahram Mark Sobhani)

Spurs Torch Warriors, 147-116, In Highest Scoring Game Since 1991

Atlanta Hawks forward Marvin Williams, looks for a shot against Charlotte Bobcats forward Boris Diaw, left, of France, during the first quarter of an NBA basketball game at Philips Arena, Friday, March 19, 2010 in Atlanta. (AP Photo/Gregory Smith)

Johnson Does His Best Jordan Impersonation, Hits Winning Shot In OT

New Orleans Hornets forward James Posey, left, reaches in for the ball as Denver Nuggets forward Carmelo Anthony looks for a shot in the fourth quarter of the Nuggets' 93-80 victory in an NBA basketball game in Denver on Thursday, March 18, 2010. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski) link

Nuggets Rout Hornets 93-80

More from SBNation.com >


OG's

Hat3_copy_small jsams

Char_dexter_biospic_small TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsMichaelBourn

Sinbad

Iggy3_small tsteidel

Profile_small Derek Bodner

The Turk

Nomoreej_small jemagee