Let's Look at it this way - roster swap
by jemagee on Dec 3, 2009 7:50 AM PST
Email
PrintOk, so the sixers are bad. They're possibly as bad as they have been in 15/20 years, possibly worst team since the 83 championship team, but we all know that. Now they've signed Iverson and just like Flash, he'll save every one of us. (Fire Ajax Missiles)
I don't know about you, but I've run out of something new to say about Iverson, or Jordan, or Stefanski or the sixers. I mean what else can you say about this team that someone else hasn't already said. They're terrible, record wise not the worst team in the league, but let's see how you really feel about this team and roster going forward.
It's a simple 'game' really. There's 30 NBA rosters, 13-15 players per roster, regardless of record or injury, let's see which rosters you wouldn't rather have than the sixers. Which rosters do you find so pathetic that you wouldn't trade the sixers roster lock stock and barrel for.
I haven't researched all the rosters but off the top of my head the knicks and raptors come completely to mind, maybe the kings but i think they might have more upside right now, the clippers are an interesting case cause healthy they ain't bad but they have a crap coach.
Not changing coaches or GM's or ownership JUSt the players.
So which rosters wouldn't you want over the sixers current roster?
Another user-created commentary provided by a Liberty Ballers reader.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
the sixers are better off the houston and indiana, as well.
just to throw 2 more teams into the mix.
human beings, who are almost unique in their ability to learn from the experiences of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so.
Oh, and Detroit, that teams is fuhhhucked
by philiafan14364 on Dec 3, 2009 1:33 PM PST up reply actions
yeah
Detroit. that might be it for me though.
by guitarmouse35 on Dec 3, 2009 1:36 PM PST up reply actions
I would definitely take the Bobcats over them, and the Kings
Only teams that I would not want are the Pistons. At least the Knicks have expiring contracts…
That has almost everything to do with the coach and almost nothing to do with the players.
by philiafan14364 on Dec 4, 2009 11:53 AM PST up reply actions
Houston....
they’re a mess..especially since McGrady is in the same boat as Iverson, only taller and a different type of player, and Yao could retire because of his foot injury. They really do not have that many assets to get more pieces, and they will be the Western Conference version of us starting next year, mediocre year after year, never getting anywhere.
My Miami Dolphins webpage is www.playoffboundsports.wordpress.com Come on over and join the discussion.
Check out these Dol-Fan t-shirts at http://problogstores.com/ppr/shop?c=80008!!! Dol-Fans Unite!!!
Worst is definitely the Knicks. The Nets at least have players to build around.
What`s going to happen to the Suns in a few years? Their backup PG is crap.
Well they’ve got a few years to figure it out, their more immediate problem is what to do with Amare
by jemagee on Dec 4, 2009 7:55 AM PST up reply actions
I would much rather have our roster than seattle’s
Oh the Boy’s in December are frightful
But to me it’s just delightful
Jerry will tell the coach to go
How they blow, how they blow, how they blow.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
