Elton Brand leads Sixers over Blazers 104-93
Well that was impressive. If you didn't read my preview (SHAME!), then here's a reminder of what I wanted to see:
I don't expect a win, but if we can hang for 4 full quarters, legitimately contend, then I'll be happy.
Happy now?! Wins are fun. Especially when they're against a team with a winning record. They don't particularly matter because we're not contenders this season, but they're nice to see from time to time, as long as we stay in a top 5 spot in the draft. If we can all realize this, then the rest of the year will be more enjoyable.
But let's get back to the win. This marks the fifth time in the past six meetings the Sixers have gotten the best of the Trailblazers. For whatever reason, we have their number. I'd say a lot of it has to do with the depleted front court, forcing Nate McMillan to play LaMarcus Aldridge at the center position for extended minutes. While I really like LMA as a player, and think he will continue to succeed alongside a healthy Greg Oden (oxymoron), he's no match for Elton Brand underneath the basket.
Speaking of Elton, he played a hell of a game. He combined with Dalembert and Speights to shoot 25-33 from the field with 53 points, 19 rebounds, and ZERO (count 'em) ZERO turnovers. That is huge. Especially against an undermanned team, you have to go inside and pound them, and that is what we did (60 points in the paint). I'm not sure if this was the gameplan, but let's give Eddie Jordan some rare credit and say that it was. We need to see more of that.
The defense looked pretty solid tonight, even better in the second half. Playing Royal Ivey (+17) and Dalembert over Green and Speights probably helped that, but nobody really killed us. It was the most complete game I've seen this Sixer team play this season (and possibly even last season), and it begins and ends with the D. Holding this team to 93 points is certainly a success for us. If we can develop an identity as a tough defensive team that forces turnovers leading to fast break points and pounding the ball inside, it would be a great step towards readying ourselves for next year, and who we want to target in the draft. Again though, I'll give credit to Dalembert for really playing a complete game, and staying within himself, something that we've been begging him to do for years. Also his inability to see Iguodala on an alley-oop from AI resulted in one of the funnier moments of the season.
I would be remiss to mention how well Andre Iguodala played tonight. It's funny to hear other people talk about him during the game and say he hasn't done much, but then you look at his line. 14 points, 9 assists, 7 rebounds, two three's, and zero turnovers. I'd say that's a helluva game. He controlled the offense, and made sure the guy with the hot hand got the ball in a position to score. He didn't get to the line at all, which is somewhat concerning, but this was a relatively loosely refereed game. Another all-star night for Andre.
Allen Iverson played really well. Got hot at the right times, but set up his teammates enough where his 19 points and 5 assists on only 11 shots is a very successful night, even more than we expect from him. Lou was average. Jrue played 11 relatively ineffective minutes, and Thad was largely invisible out there. But there were enough positives in this game to overlook some things that went wrong. We're not going to consistently shoot this well from the field, but we can keep outworking our opponents, limit turnovers, and create opportunities for teammates to have some success. Great win.
Player of the Game: Elton Brand
DNPCD of the Game: Primoz Brezec and Jason Kapono (what what!)
0 recs |
63 comments
|
Comments
Ok, I can look past the fact that your a Blazers fan, but dude, change your picture, thats not cool.
by philiafan14364 on Dec 29, 2009 7:55 AM PST up reply actions
i like elton from the bench, it fires him up more
and yea Iverson can still play
eff you we winning anyway
A.I. IS BACKKKKKKK
Lol
nevermind the fact he’s in game shape now as opposed to the start of the year.
Looking for in-depth basketball analysis? Try http://www.basketballfreeforall.com!
Maybe this is what a fully healthy Sixer team is capable of
Oh wait, on second thought, probably not.
Maybe they want/need willie green or sam dalembert?
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 8:42 AM PST up reply actions
Everybody needs Willie Green and Sam Dalembert. In actuality, Dalembert may be an option for them. I’ll mess around on trade machine and see if anything comes up.
by Michael Levin on Dec 29, 2009 8:43 AM PST up reply actions
No one needs Sam Dalembert, not this season, or the sixers would have found a taker, coming up on a year of trying to trade him.
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 8:44 AM PST up reply actions
This is just coming off injuries to Oden and Przybilla though. The need is there more than it was before. I don’t think its going to happen, but if they’re blinded by desperation and Sam actually playing a decent game last night, there’s potential there.
by Michael Levin on Dec 29, 2009 8:46 AM PST up reply actions
Kevin Pritchard is usually paralyzed by doubt when his entire roster is healthy – no way a damaged roster makes him more likely to make a move.
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 8:46 AM PST up reply actions
T-Mac?
Do the sixers have any interest in bringing in T-Mac? Do we even want them to trade for him? Trading for him and his expiring contract would help us get rid of Dalembert or Brand if the rockets bite on that.
Chase Utley is so good that on one pitch he stole second, third and the shortstop's hat.
If we can shred some serious contracts, bite the bullet on this year and next to get a couple more draft picks, I may not be opposed to it. I dont like McGrady (who does?) but a fat 22 million dollar contract coming off the books would be mighty nice for some economic flexibility.
by Michael Levin on Dec 29, 2009 8:44 AM PST up reply actions
The rockets won’t take the sixers flotsam to get rid of McGrady, it’s a weird situation, they’ll love to trade him but don’t want to take back any onctracts, it’s like the jazz with boozer, they want rid of the player but value the expiring cap space, and they want TALENT to get mcgrady…and he makes 23 million this year.
Good luck finding a trade
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 8:46 AM PST up reply actions
I think Brand’s a possibility. He brings them another tough rebounder inside to go with Landry, Scola and Hayes. He’d make them more of a contender (they’re 18-13), bringing a proven guy to a team filled mostly with not so talented guys who play well together. Brand and Kapono for T-Mac works. It’s such an awful trade that I don’t know I’d be able to like it, but coming to terms that we won’t be good for the next 3-4 years, it makes sense to try to clear as much space as we can. And maybe pick up a draft pick.
by Michael Levin on Dec 29, 2009 8:51 AM PST up reply actions
If they make that trade I’m coming to where you live and punching you in the kidneys – cause it’s your fault for putting it out there
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 8:52 AM PST up reply actions
Oh good, I’m just glad they pay attention to this blog. Media integration, I dig it.
by Michael Levin on Dec 29, 2009 8:55 AM PST up reply actions
I’m sure any blog that was invited to a Stefanski conference call is at least perused by someone associated with the sixers organization, and since we know the people RUNNING the organization are clueless who knows where they might find ideas.
The Rockets didn’t want Jared Jeffries cause his contract is too long – they sure as hell don’t want brand.
I don’t know that mcgrady gets traded anywhere
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 8:57 AM PST up reply actions
Let’s make a deal. This goes out to any FO people in the organization. If they make the Brand/Kapono – McGrady trade, John gets to punch me in the kidneys, but I get a piece of McGrady’s contract. I think that’s fair.
I think a lot of why they didn’t want Jared Jeffries is because he’s Jared Jeffries. They gave Ariza 4 years. He’ll be entering his prime in those 4 years, but Brand will still be able to do most of what he can do now for the duration of his contract. Explosiveness is not his game, it’s crafty veteran moves, a 15 foot jumper, and good rebounding position.
by Michael Levin on Dec 29, 2009 9:03 AM PST up reply actions
Supposedly the sixers have been shopping Brand for a couple months, and McGrady has been on the block most of the season.
Saving money is priority 1 (2 and 3 probably) for Comcast. If the rockets were willing to take Brand off the sixers hands to save all that money, you don’t think the sixers would have done that already.
There are a few GM’s I don’t want Stefanski going up again cause he’ll be over matched – Morey is one of them…
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 9:06 AM PST up reply actions
i dont think mcgrady’s moving, and i’m not sure i would make the deal because at best we’d end up getting the 8th seed, losing in the 1st round, and once again missing out on a top draft pick, but we would shed his contract and if someone with half a brain in the front office can bring in some good players for the $20M that would be gone after mcgrady’s contract is up, it might be worth it long term and turning a 5 yr plan into a 4 yr plan.
Chase Utley is so good that on one pitch he stole second, third and the shortstop's hat.
The sixers wouldn’t have 20 million dollars in cap room though – it’s not that simple
They’re over the cap already – and it’s going down next year
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 9:07 AM PST up reply actions
you think we’d improve if we traded brand for mcgrady? am I on camera?
by Michael Levin on Dec 29, 2009 9:09 AM PST up reply actions
to be honest, i think they are both a few years past their primes, so i think its a wash. if 20 million dollars in potential cap room is incorrect due to the cap going down next year and the sixers being over already, then i guess its not worth it.
and it’s not ashton, its peter funt.
Chase Utley is so good that on one pitch he stole second, third and the shortstop's hat.
So wait, whos side are you on? The Sixers or the Rockets?
Because Tmac for Brand + Kapono is a great trade for the Sixers…
by philiafan14364 on Dec 29, 2009 9:28 AM PST up reply actions
No it’s not…unless of course you believe the BS coming from the sixers camp and missed the performance of brand against teams like the celtics and blazers.
I mean it is possible, flyers fans can be like that
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 9:30 AM PST up reply actions
No see, Im from the camp that thinks we should be trying to lose as many games as possible this year. Theres some guy thats gonna be in the draft next year that might turn out to be a pretty good basketball player…
by philiafan14364 on Dec 29, 2009 9:33 AM PST up reply actions
and even with the worst record in the league – there’s a 75% chance the sixers don’t get him.
I’m from the camp who thinks you develop the young guys cause you have a pretty strong core and brands a part of that but you need the right coach and comcast to loosen the purse strings a little.
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 9:36 AM PST up reply actions
When this team is ready to seriously compete, Brand will be in his mid 30s and way over the hill.
And to your first point, 25% is still a lot better than whatever chance we have right now.
by philiafan14364 on Dec 29, 2009 9:44 AM PST up reply actions
Your psychic abilities aside, with the right coach and smart moves this team is a lot closer to contending than ‘a few years’
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 9:52 AM PST up reply actions
You really think so?
Andre, Lou, Thad, Speights and Jrue in two or three years will probably look something more like the present day Hawks than the Celtics.
Honestly, I dont think the ‘core’ of this team as is will ever be capable of winning a championship, even when they are all in their primes. And a 33/34 year old Elton Brand wont change that.
by philiafan14364 on Dec 29, 2009 9:23 PM PST up reply actions
I don’t think it matters if Brand starts or not, but he should absolutely get 30 minutes and plenty of looks every night. With him and Dalembert in there, we are much better on the boards and on defense.
Sammys only the ‘starter’ to win the jump ball. Hes outta the game after 5 minutes almost every time.
by philiafan14364 on Dec 29, 2009 9:34 AM PST up reply actions
Usually because he has 2 fouls…because he, um, SUCKS
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 9:36 AM PST up reply actions
No to T-Mac. And trading Brand for him would set us back. Brand is an inside scorer, we have plenty of -players who can do what T-mac does for a lot less. I wouldn’t even trade Dalembert for him, as Sam’s rebounding and defense are more important for the Sixers than T-Mac’s scoring.
It’s absurd to talk about trades when this current team hasn’t played anywhere near their potential. Still haven’t had a game where all 5 starters were clicking. How does Thad disappear some nights?
For the first time in a long time, the Sixers looked like a good basketball team. There was a point in the game where you could see that Portland wanted to take the game back from the Sixers, and for the first time, the Sixers increased their intensity and broke their backs.
I think the Sixers can play the way they did last night all of the time, and I also think that if they do, they can win quite a few games.
Brand is not an inside scorer it turns out – never has been – but thanks for trying to help.
How does thad disappear some nights? Maybe he’s just not very good? Maybe he like speights doesn’t care much about anything but ‘getting his’
They had one good game against a poorly coached team (how often does that happen, jordan out coaches someone) and here you are with you ’we’re on our way’ craziness
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 10:21 AM PST up reply actions
If a guy posts up on the block he’s an inside scorer. You think a guy who grabs boards and stuffs them back in the basket isn’t an inside scorer? You really are a jackass at times you know?
I didn’t say we’re on our way, either. They have the potential, but I’ve said that all along.
Yup – I’m a jackass at times
Better than being you at any time though would be my guess
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 12:29 PM PST up reply actions
Keep in mind folks – last off season – all the sixers moves were in regards to avoiding the luxury tax.
I don’t know EXACTLY how it’s calculated – but the sixers have 66 million dollars committed in salaries next year and the salary cap is going to drop to 50-54 million – if the sixers were ‘up against’ the tax this season, the drop in cap (and i think drop in luxury tax number as well) will put them over the tax level which they wouldn’t come near even to re-sign the ‘great’ andre miller.
I expect some really pathetic cost saving moves shortly
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 10:22 AM PST reply actions
In case you haven’t figured it out, the whole league is in trouble, which is why they are trying to control costs. The economy is making it harder for entertainment to be profitable. Expect lots of teams to look for ways to get rid of players and their “inflated” salaries, like T-Mac. The teams that are over the cap may not continue to stay that way either, you’re going to see lots of older players treated more like Iverson, and more free agents hitting the market with no new home lined up.
http://www.hoopdata.com/player.aspx?name=Elton%20Brand
Well look at that – the majority of elton brands shots this year are beyond 10 feet
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 12:31 PM PST reply actions
Except that the stat shows the opposite! If you combine the at the rim and inside 10’ shot attempts they are higher then his outside shot totals.
They are?
3.6 + 1.8 is 5.4
2.9 + 2.6 is 5.5
So technically, they aren’t higher…i’m not talking about percentages, i’m talking about attempts. You may try to alter the numbers to sway your point to him being some sort of ‘low post banger’ but this year it’s pretty even
And this is the closest it’s been in his career if you look at the numbers.
In comparison
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 2:19 PM PST up reply actions
OK, you are right, 5.5 is higher. So basically half his shots are inside and half are outside, but he also draws fouls inside so more of his scoring comes from inside. I think you can expect to see more of an inside game from Brand now that he’s getting healthy and the team looks to set him up in the post. He’s a little short for a power forward, but he’s one of the more physical players in the game. There aren’t too many players who can stay with him. When he gets aggressive going to the hoop as he is starting to, he is one of the better forwards in the NBA. He doesn’t deserve an All-Star slot this season based on what has happened so far, but he’s already starting to put out numbers at that level. TD doesn’t have Elton’s range!
Welcome to the Eastern Conference.
We’re only 4 1/2 games out of the 8th seed.
I still pray for John Wall.
and only 6 1/2 out of worst record in the league
and the 3rd worst record in the league period.
But see if they squeak into the playoffs and lose in the first round it will be ‘positive’
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 12:44 PM PST up reply actions
Yo philly fans
I’m really happy for you, and I’ma let you finish, but the Blazers have one of the most injury plagued seasons of all time! of all time!
I'm not saying, I'm just saying.
Oh please….the kings, the warriors, the clippers without the top pick in the draft
I don’t even think the blazers are having one of the most injury plagued seasons this year
the nets too – pretty injury plagued
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 1:55 PM PST up reply actions
John HOllinger
Seriously Philly people, stop it with the Dalembert for TMac trades. Nobody wants him, you’ve been trying to unload him for the last 18 months.
Someone suggested Iguodala and Dalembert For t-mac and a first round pick
Let me say that is the sixers made that trade i’d kill stefanski mysef
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 2:01 PM PST reply actions
T-Mac is a 23 million dollar expiring contract, and that’s all he is
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 2:57 PM PST up reply actions
Kentucky is on ESPN 2 tonight and Kansas is on ESPN U
by jemagee on Dec 29, 2009 3:48 PM PST reply actions

by 












